Had a mini-intuition and I ‘cheated’ and open up my calendar in a way I’m technically not supposed to and booked a lead who closed at a very large sale.
Aside from that experiencing a fairly slow week. And I can’t sustainaly book clients that way lol. Thing are picking up a bit and with a solid friday and saturday I can close a big week, but no where near as strong as the 4 days I did last week or the week before. I’ll wait unil saturday to before a full assesment but so far a little underwhelmed and much slower than my stack last week. Maybe stacking OG RICH and New RICH is the move. Currently stack feels lighter too, less intense and driven, almost lax. Also measuring in weeks may not be the best when assesing, but the last two weeks were bonkers with my old stack and some store title 2026 RICH.
Last week ended up being very solid
this week has been so slow- landscape is down for everyone on team. That rarely impacts me though.
Lot of back out, and sales not eligible as well on top of the slowness
On track for a decent month, but WAY slower than normal and I’d like
So far R.I.C.H store version acting faster than in my custom OR
stacking them is just faster .
No sure the drop in performance, manifestation, from what seemed epic start so far with new R.I.C.H, But I have found sometimes there needs to be a bit of an exhale before the re-up
I have been testing paragon more, so maybe the energy is going there.
Forum readers who follow this journal: I ask that discussions here be approached with nuance, responsibility, context, and a measure of intellectual honesty—especially when addressing what may appear to be a lack of results or a “negative” experience.
If we lose that balance, the conversation tends to drift toward two unhelpful extremes: either an atmosphere that spreads negativity without context, or a performative positivity where only success is allowed to be voiced. (As a result of needing to deal with the over-negativity) In both cases, the real purpose of sharing experiences is lost.
To me-the aim should be open, thoughtful discussion—where people feel comfortable speaking honestly about what is working, what is challenging, and what may not be producing the results they hoped for, without fear of dismissal or distortion. Honest experience, expressed with care and context, is far more valuable than either blind criticism or forced optimism for people finding the results they want, or understanding what can help in getting there.
My current experience
On my new stacks, it is very mixed.
I’m currently doing ASBR/with Crown and Capital custom and True Sell/ with New R.I.C.H custom
Things just seem very off. I did a washout the last 4 days and still experiencing that.
I like my experience of myself on calls more. I feel more connected to things in my life that matter. I’m seeing new openings for action that make life more fulfilling and contribute to a larger but I also feel way more emotionally processing that ususual. I go between feeling kind of stiff and stifled to lots of sadness, blips of depression, upset.
I have some unresolved physical injuries that may be contributing. I have some concernes of more major procedures being needed to resolve, but too early to say yet. I did add Paragon as my third sub last week, but it didn’t seem to help much in the way I wanted at least. Had some really great effects for sure though around. Will write another post on that.
I’m feeling my faith and confidence in myself is a bit shook-even as I feel more level-headed, but less in touch with that sense of inevitable destiny of my own sales success. This can happen sometimes during down periods but not always and not often
March has been very slow and subpar- for me. It has been slower for the team overal, but no so slow I would attribute it to just the lead landscape.
Of my last 7 weeks on upgrade versions subs, 2 have been god-tier and the rest slow. I’ve pulled out really good February with those two weeks.
Correlation is not causation, but as of now, the peaks are higher, the consistency is nowhere near as strong, and my experience is better. Will see how this week plays.
This comment is directed at what I told @Plutus the other day here:
Now, I don’t mind people making pleas for objectivity. I enjoy it. But if we are going to talk about objectivity, I fail to see how you can so easily hand wave and dismiss the very pattern that I pointed out:
What other explanation exists for a situation where last year – before political turmoil and economic instability really rushed to the forefront of the collective – your team (and yourself) were doing well, and then EVERYONE on the team, including yourself suddenly experiences a decrease of leads?
The reasonable answer is “market forces beyond an individual’s immediate control,” especially considering that any time there are wars and rumors of wars, economic fluctuation occurs immediately after. And this is something I am not even willing to debate upon, as it has been so well-documented, discussed and researched that many believe that the “elites” do this on purpose to force a market reset.
The unreasonable answer is to suggest that not only is C&C somehow “negatively” affecting your results, but now the entire team? But I don’t think you were actually suggesting that, correct?
Look at your stack.
ASBR – one of the more difficult titles to wield, with a very future oriented angle.
C&C – possibly the most future focused title we have ever made.
New R.I.C.H. – New tech, pretty easy to run
True Sell – Older tech, pretty easy to run
I see what you’re trying to achieve with this stack. That being said: it’s a very, very future focused stack. Meaning, any deep or subtle blockages you had regarding this topic (and that’s the thing with blockages, the conscious mind can’t often see them until they become aware of it) would come rushing to the surface as recon:
Of course you would experience doubt about the future. You’re running a very future-oriented stack. This is recon regarding the future, as you would expect with ASBR and C&C. I’m not sure if you’re even registering it as recon, since recon on ZPU feels much different. It is not as depressive feeling as before, it may even register as insight. Since that’s exactly what ZPU is supposed to do.
This is why you’re describing it as (paraphrasing) “I feel shaken, yet still solid. I can accurately identify what is bothering me.” This is exactly what ZPU is supposed to help with. Recon should no longer feel like a heavy weight on the inner life, but rather insight into the issue. But if that insight gets redirected away from the true cause and projected onto the title, even the most objective of measurements still becomes biased.
The entire “is the title not working / supposedly broken / flawed” thing is one of the most common forms of reconciliation. We have all seen this before. We have all seen this when tech changes. It always occurs, because the new tech triggers new forms of reconciliation. With ZPU reconciliation itself – if it does not occur alongside strong negative emotions – is a lot more hard to spot, and that’s the REAL reason we pumped the brakes on releases.
Not that the tech is somehow flawed – it is not, for many reasons that I am not going to disclose except one: it’s not that different from Zero Point. It is not the complete pivot that Qv2 to ZP was.
ZPU-tech has been introduced incrementally for quite sometime, we were quite masterful and precise at how we approached. The customers, however, are not used to how it operates. It is similar, but different in expression. That is why we expedited Summertime. No baggage, no expectations, just pure fun and relaxation, allowing people to really explore ZPU without disrupts to their stack or having to deal with changes in tone, etc.
I fear that the Anti-Recon is doing its job too well. Before, when recon was accompanied with a certain inner state of deep processing, the individual was almost forced by the weight of the emotional load to resolve the issue. And this ties into a conversation larger than the scope of this particular one, regarding the addiction most people have to intense experiences as a catalyst toward transformation. Most of us are inherently expecting transformation to feel intense, and rightfully so – since that’s what we all did. And many of you ran Qv2 and early ZP. Effective, yes? Intense? Yes, it could most definitely be intense.
Now, everyone – I know many of you glamorize what you think we do at Subliminal Club everyday. I am telling you the absolute honest truth that the majority of our work involves reading charts and doing data analysis. Pulling every customer report, categorizing them, looking for patterns, charting those patterns, figuring out how we can help with the issues tech wise. It is not as fun as you think. Rewarding? Yes. But I look at so many charts that I just wanna scream sometimes. You all are the ones having the fun and experiencing the wonders.
I say this to help everyone understand why we are so confident in ZPU. We have tested it, we have done the work, we have questioned every data point, questioned each other. The confidence is well-earned.
This whole thing that’s been occurring since, well… WDB, is just subtle recon. The normal recon cues just aren’t there for many people. Now, I have many very obvious examples of this, but the intention here isn’t to create this “divide” between people but rather bridge the gap by pointing out that many of these questions regarding ZPU are being driven by fear and recon – if you look close enough, it is very obvious.
It is quite a dilemma, that we have managed to reduce recon’s disruptive effect, only to find that a large majority are now unable to see when it is occurring because the process is so much more simple. The question I would ask anyone reading this post is: Are you truly being objective? Or have you found an easy scapegoat to push issues onto?
I’ll give a hint, based on all my years of experience doing this: if reading that question, you experienced anger, frustration, a desire to fire back… I would suggest to look again and see what you’re really not facing.
@SaintSovereign, thanks for the clarification and insights into the nature of what may be occurring. I’m a little surprised at the long reply and attention here, but it seems in the larger context of using my post to point out the pattern you’re seeing.
I originally wrote a qualifier on my post ( I said I’m a little concerned what may get extrapolated from this), then deleted it lol, but I’m glad I didn’t too hear the breakdown here. record
Some context that:
A lot of my posts in this journal over the last 3 years have been up and down, questioning and doubting what’s working and what’s not. What could make things better. The last year has been especially strong, so it’s reset a new baseline for what’s expected of me, but the push and pull of what I am doing, what’s the best stack, what’s working or not working, externally, and my own questioning has always been part of what I journal
and that I also literally journal as a place to vent into ‘alchemy’. It’s not always an alarm bell for me in the long run. It was when I first started C&C, and that got addressed. It was at points in the past as well, but that is by far rare and the exception.
The variables of the company I work at are consistently inconsistent enough where that’s a given- I am looking at how subs impact my performance and results for my life, given that consistently inconsistent landscape. That’s the game I am playing in this journal by using subs.
(There are actually many larger ways subs are affecting my growth, which I don’t always share in this journal. This journal is the game of using subs as tools to maximize my current wealth/ sales endeavors.)
It shouldn’t be dismissed; but yes exactly -I am measuring myself against the internal landscape of my team and my own expectations in performance.
I’ve spent three years attributing subs in the results I have. I realize that as long as my company’s bottom line per month stays the same, there is nothing else to look at in my sales success but my performance and stack. And they have been 3.5-4M every month for the last 18 months on OT, this month for that as well.
(Actually, inside the game of this journal and the team landscape, what is happening on the planet is irrelevant, not that it doesn’t matter or doesn’t have an impact, but given the comparative performance of the closed system I am looking at, it’s always uniform across the board with whatever impact the world would have on this specific sales landscape. To start attributing what’s not working in sales due to the state of the world would also mean attributing positive results to factors outside my performance and control, which, from a systems perspective, is of course true, but not what I am looking at in performance, and sub use, and my journey)
Correct- I don’t think C&C is affecting me negatively here. Nor do I think any sub outside of recon would.
From the perspective of achieving a masterful calibration of incredibly high, consistent performance on a specific stack for a year straight, any sub I add that doesn’t work immediately as well could 'technically 'negatively impact performance. Which was more the case of the issue with C&C than anything else.
Adding new R.I.C.H completely changed how C&C showed up in my stack. And I am crystal clear that C&C is a beast designed for other things… than short-term sales, although it can benefit from that in the right stack. I’ve been tuning it to work well in my stack.
I’ve performed as well as I have ever performed in a month (almost) on C&C, the question of its overall ability in my stack is not in doubt in terms of capacity.
The question of whether it is the best fit for my current goals, optimization, and consistency vs other options is still on the table, but my plan was to run it until mid-April at least. Let it bloom and then re-assess
My slow and subpar month is still quite decent- it’s sub-par compared to team, what I know I am capable of and what I’ve experienced.
If I am being outperformed or performing less well than I normally do, that is something I look at on three fronts ( my on-call performance with technicalities, my disposition, my stack, which of course can impact the other two)
And I will look at subs in my stack for this as a contributing factor, .
With the understanding and lightness that there are always factors outside my control that I am not looking at.
I got a taste of something in the first two weeks on R.I.C.H that I never experienced in sales before. Like mind-boggling, reality-warping results. And I was looking at the energetics of that.I’m thinking now I’d need something like a KB or AEON run to consistently maintain that level of results. But hoping for more work with R.I.C.H solo can have repeats like that.
From a systems perspective, the way the company was handling and spending on marketing likely dropped - and potentially clientelle/ people are affected in spending by the things you cited…from a personal perspective, I always try to look at who I am, being that resonates with what is showing up in my experience. Subs can be tools that contribute to my inner experience that affects this. (I know this may not be true, but it empowers me to view it this way and )
I think aiming for objectivity is great and definitely something I want to get better at, but my plea was more about accounting for nuance in communication, a willingness not to be so polarized. Including a willingness to see a challenge as a temporary result, which is what I am attempting to do.
I gave my request for two reasons
This was in defense of someone saying I attributed new wealth titles to negative results- I was saying this for the opposite.
I believe people should be able to voice all of their experiences, including concerns, mismatched expectations, and challenges, without there being a larger concern of others percieving over- negativity or blaming subs.
At this point, I’d like to simply share and deal with my experience without the responsibility of the impact of what I am saying, contributing to, or not contributing to some larger issue.
This was the stack that delivered the best performance last year. For 12 months straight It was unparalleled for what I was trying to do with just sales. Now I want more things outside of that, and the scope of the new subs and tech is much larger and with more potential. I think I am grappling with how to really fulfill the larger objectives of these future-oriented stacks in a way I was never really looking at before, and, as mentioned, with much deeper, more subtle layers of recon.
I’m not quite sure I understand this. I am experiencing difficulties as a form of recon, but it’s not because of the sub; it’s recon? But because Recon is so light and subtle, I’m attributing it to the sub rather than Recon?
How do you suggest navigating this? Especially if recon’s disruptive effects have been reduced to the point of not noticing, what is recon now other than its disruptive effects? Simply dissonance?
Well, hopefully once you start running Summertime, you’ll be enjoying those charts and getting in on the fun and wonder!! lol
Thank you for the support all these years. We all may not see eye-to-eye all the time, but we greatly appreciate your input and contributions throughout the years.
