ZPU is not out yet
yes I know was wondering what the eta on it for the qtks build. It in the newer sub like aeon, hero and glm so it kinda being tested publicly
The new titles are not ZPU. They are ZPU Lite:
ZPU build is a long time away. Maybe after a year. And most probably after all the remaining titles are updated witb the New Subliminal Experience along with rewriting the script from scratch too.
In short, ZPU will take a long time to reach in the main store, customs and QTKS.
5 Likes
I’ve been thinking about this schedule.
Is overload from having the cycle too long actually just a form of recon?
So the fix is to just shorten the loop when the overload starts to hit around that time.
So, if i can run 15m from day 1 - 17 with no problem, but then struggle with overload after, I could have just shorten the loop until the overload is gone.
1 Like
Is this also advisable for customs?
3 Likes
I’ll have to get the exact list of when anti-recon started. It was around Emperor: The Art of War. That may have been the first. Everything after that has it.
Remember everyone. This ONLY WORKS – it ONLY WORKS if you are using the progressive microloop strategy. That means, even if you can handle more exposure now, you need to start over and work through the strategy. This is not meant to be used with or “alongside” the current instructions. That’s why there’s less washout time, as you’re going to be spending more time at shorter listening time. By the time you can reach full loops, you will have worked through so many issues that the longer times do not affect you as it would now.
Also, you can add a 5m if you’d like – we mention that later in the instructions. The idea here is that the jump from 3m to 7m would trigger less recon if the individual has worked their way up to 3m or so legitimately. If, through testing, that proves untrue, we’ll add the 5m back to the official recommendations.
No, you would continue with this new schedule. Theoretically, if you have managed to reach a recon-less 15m loop, it would not bother you to use this schedule. But again, you must work your way up following the strategy. That means going back down when you experience recon. You can, of course, continue to use it at your “sweet spot” for as long as you want.
As for multiple subs – the easiest way to handle this is to only progress with longer listening times once you’re not experiencing strong recon from the entire stack. It may be difficult to see which title is causing recon, so it’s best to continue the entire stack as “one single subliminal” in that they all interconnect, work together and operate as one – by design. So keep everything at the same exposure length until recon isn’t triggered as much (or not at all).
It was not intentional. We answer a lot of questions and there are multiple users with this “anon + numbers” username. If all of you post in a thread, it becomes confusing and we may accidentally overlook someone.
Under the progressive microloop strategy, you would listen to all three titles at the appropriate length in the same day. If that’s 30s, you’d listen to all three at 30s. Following day would be a rest day, where you would analyze your inner state, looking for recon. If there is none, you can attempt a higher rate of exposure the next day.
rofl, exactly. Like, literally this. There is no secret formula or hidden method. It is literally just to use the format of the subliminal audio in the most effective manner. The goal is literally to help you get to full 15 minute loops without disruption. That’s it. There’s no need to overthink it. It provides a framework – a system for you to work through and analyze results against.
Again, you can always modify the listening times a bit. By this, we mean that if you can reach 3m consistently with no recon, but you don’t want to do 7m, you can always do 3m 30s or 4m 30s to test your response. 4m 22s – doesn’t matter. Now, please don’t abuse them and “jump ahead” claiming it was a test unless you are an advanced user who will accept any triggered recon as overexposure.
I mean, we pretty much always recommended long-term use, or at least a few cycles. We offer a 30-day refund policy based on the premise that we are confident that individuals would see results within that time period, but we never claimed that you would master the title within that time period.
Long-term use is phenomenal, especially if you’re taking incredible action. I ran pretty much every cognitive enhancement title available here. When people ask how we’re able to do what we do, what the “secret” is… the answer is simple: we ran our own products long-term while taking action (the company). And people tend to not believe us when we say that we don’t have “secret versions” of the titles that are better. We run the production version, the same versions you run. In fact, my GLM + Earth run isn’t even name-embedded.
So yeah – long-term use without sub hopping can lead to great results, especially if your stack is very aligned with what it is you’re doing.
See above response regarding this.
Exactly. And I think the reason you were thinking of an approach like this is because we were also considering users like yourself when designing the system. I suspect that much of what people experience as recon could be overexposure, and so we designed the system around customer choice. Looks like we came to similar conclusions.
Yes. You’ve got the idea.
See above. You can add it back if you like.
Exactly.
Do not overthink it, please. Please, everyone – lol don’t overthink it. There is another article coming explaining how microloops work, where we explain why you don’t need to jump ahead to get “the full script.” At the risk of causing more confusion, I will say that @emperor_obewan was the closest to get it right, stating that he believed the script was written in a fractal manner (or something of the sort).
There are four sections of the title, but the script itself is written in a recursive manner, meaning each part contains the whole. Every section covers the same topics and themes, but with different expressions. By “skipping ahead,” you’re actually harming your results, because there will be content that hasn’t been properly integrated and expressed, and you’ll slow yourself down. This is not a situation where a person needs to think “I can handle this,” and then overexpose. The advanced user – those who truly want to master a title – will work through the script with unwavering focus and skill, building a strong foundation that they can then later build upon with the later script.
You can order one of those now. The ZPU-lite scripting are inherent to the cores and the Q-software has long been configured to produce a ZPU-lite title. All of them are.
Yes, you can use this strategy with customs.
15 Likes
@SaintSovereign, just want to confirm that 3 titles in one day is recommended with microloop strategy? So, when one gets up to the full 15 minutes loop, that is 45 minutes every other day. That would seem a lot to process.
Also with the 30 listening days as 1 full cycle, is this the new recommendation for length of cycle? Will you still recommend users to 3 cycles on a sub to get full benefits?
I see your point and I agree. I meant something else, but maybe I didnt express it well enough.
I was saying why couldnt the cycle itself be longer.
1 Like
Once you’ve made it to consistent 15 minute loops, you have already worked through the entire script and at that point, processing should be easy.
7 Likes
If I’ve built up to 15 minutes with one title in my first cycle, and in the second cycle I want to add one or two more titles starting at 30 seconds, should I also go back to 30 seconds with the first title, or can I keep that one at 15 minutes?
3 Likes
Is 30m if you only have 1 sub in your stack still valid with this schedule?
Edit: Also, what’s your thought about long washouts (a few weeks to months long)? Is it still relevant?
1 Like
No, it would still only be 15 minutes for now. We may update this in the future. More information is needed.
If you work through the strategy with focus, there will be no need for long washouts, but they will still be immensely helpful in terms of integration and taking a pause to see if that title – or any title is necessary.
5 Likes
Can I do: 7 mins title A and 30 secs title B.
Or do I have to do both titles at the same time (eg. Title A 30 s and title B 30s).
I am doing it this way coz I have alot of experience with full loops of title A but no experience of title B.
@SaintSovereign
Edit: I saw that U answered similar question up above but I would still like to get Ur thoughts on this. (Maybe others have the same question)
2 Likes
Very glad that these new Listening Instructions were released. I was really craving them.
Thanks!
They seem very solid to me.
5 Likes
@SaintSovereign
If the goal is always to reach the full 15 minutes in the end, may I ask why you have been running mostly 30 seconds loops when you ran KHAN Black and why you didn’t increase your exposure time to longer? Thanks.
5 Likes
@SaintSovereign can you give a rough estimate on how long it would take someone to get to full loops? I understand that it’s individual but I’m afraid to just rush it if I don’t notice recon, so I want to have a rough timeframe at least
Also, regarding Ascension Chamber - is it still supposed to be used once every 7 days with this new schedule?
1 Like
5 char
2 Likes
Saint shared before. His mind needs to be in stable and relax mode so that he can write the script.
He doesn’t want the script quality being affected by recon.
1 Like
First, I have to avoid recon much more than the customer. I am also an avid Qigong practitioner and didn’t want to overload or tax my energetic systems. I was using KB to boost the Qigong, not vice versa. I proceed very slow and with focus and discipline when engaging with anything.
Very much depends on the individual. There are some who are already doing full loops and getting good results. Others have to proceed slowly. There are many reasons as to why someone can progress faster, but please note that none of them really have to do with a person being “inherently better” than another. I point this out because the nature of the script meets the person at their level, and in many cases, those who are using less exposure get better results than those who do the full loop.
7 Likes