well said,
I’m of two different worlds when it comes to clarifying questions
On the one hand -the principles- like you speak of are laid out relatively clearly and it’s up to us to take the general wisdom, discern, and make informed choices through extrapolation of the answers given.
Anything else could be a never ending- serious of minor clarifications, highly personalized and specific questions, and likely many of the above repeated ad nauseam.
On the other hand -personally I would love to be able to base decisions on extensive testing, understanding, and detail/specifics, the facts and the little distinctions. As a form of due diligence in choosing/mitigating risk with higher volume. By risk I mean time, money, and diminished results vs. more areas/systems addressed in less time.
Like 4 persons testing 6 systems, 3 saw distinct clear results in all modules chosen, 2 saw minor changes in all modules chosen, and 1 saw changes in only 1 of 6 module chosen–all in (random time frame) etc.
Course I guess I always want to know everything about everything I’m interested in and that data is not part of package, so happy to have these awesome new modules at my fingertips (although I won’t be adding cutaneous or integumantary system modules for a while lol) and time to get experimenting.