[opinion] The mind is always in conversation. In fact, many might argue that the mind, fundamentally, is a conversation, or a great number of conversations, being carried out ongoingly and simultaneously.
The mind is a perpetual conversation about the coordination of processes and perceptions. Internal processes and perceptions (the internal environment of the body, the Self, the identity) and External processes and perceptions (nature, Society, the world and Cosmos around us). The essential function of the nervous system is adaptive coordination to perpetually shifting circumstances. This coordination is “the subject” of the conversation that is the Mind.
The subliminal contributes to this ongoing conversation(s) that is the mind.
The point of that descriptive paragraph from Sub Club about ZP that you’ve quoted above is that, relative to earlier builds, this contribution by the ZP subliminal is done in a style that is non-forceful and harmonious, inviting (rather than demanding). The ZP subliminal is not shouting or yelling at the mind to receive its messages. It is, rather, interfacing smoothly with the mind to find those places and ways where the mind is able to harmoniously and naturally receive.
It’s the difference between breaking into a building forcefully, and simply walking around and trying the doors until you find one that is unlocked (or easily able to be unlocked).
By approaching the conversation in this way, ZP does not elicit defensive reactions or forceful, frightened resistance; on the contrary, it is welcomed and invited within.
ZP is like a trustworthy, honorable guest who, coming to visit the United Nations, enters through an appropriate doorway and is therefore welcomed and accepted to join in the ongoing negotiations and talks that are occurring within.
As for the “conversations” themselves, these are ongoing. ZP merely enters, joins as a participant, and immediately begins to offer beneficial, valuable contributions to these conversations, thereby influencing the the mind’s conversations to proceed in healthier and more effective directions and at an increasingly optimal quality level.
ZP is a wise and trustworthy consultant that raises the quality of the conversations that it joins.
As for the underlying implied question of your post:
In other words, ‘for how long after her departure, will the beneficial effects of this visitor’s contributions remain?’
This probably has primarily to do with two factors:
- The capacity of the mind to learn and to receive the essence of the visitor’s wisdom (i.e., receptiveness)
and
- How much learning was required to be done (i.e., developmental level)
For point 1, I might be an 8-year-old who has an excellent learning attitude, degree of intelligence, and attention quality. I am very good at learning. These ideally receptive qualities are going to allow me to make the most of my interaction with a wise, talented teacher.
But also (for point 2), if the teacher happens to be a University professor of calculus and theoretical mathematics, then even with my amazingly receptive intelligence, my 8-year-old developmental level will still need quite a bit of time to internalize all of what that teacher is able to tell me.
One or both of these factors may cause me to forget (or fail to receive) some of what that teacher said and I may therefore need to return back and converse a bit more often in order to really learn. But with each repeated exposure and each additional conversation, I will be learning and internalizing more and more.
