Everyone is welcome to their opinion and experiences. The issue is when people’s subjective experiences are stated as fact and begin circulating as widespread misinformation and we have to spend significant amounts of time fighting that misinformation rather than conducting research. Case in point:
How do you know? Have you tracked and measured people’s experiences with New Dawn vs. Q in regards to wealth building? We have.
We’ve got over 2000 pages of research and results and we can definitively say that the majority of people running Q-powered titles begin seeing results SIGNIFICANTLY faster than New Dawn-powered ones. Most people running Q titles start experiencing acute results within a single day. In fact, we’ve even identified and begun observing a distinct and predictable “cycle of reconciliation” that tends to occur with those running Q-powered subs and we’re working on a protocol (and scripting) to prevent it from happening. This is the data that you don’t have, because you’re working off subjective experiences and spot checking various journals. Meanwhile, we have Q (the software) crawling the forum, collecting and tagging experiences that gives us a much greater body of data to pull conclusions from.
It’s fine to post your observations and solicit discussion. It’s not okay to treat subjective experiences as dogma and start derailing other people’s journeys. Switching subs, “not feeling anything,” etc. are all signs of reconciliation. @Badboi’s original post was that Q subs make him feel constantly irritated and moody. That’s a clear and obvious sign of reconciliation. In fact, he said he’s tried “one loop per day and up to seven loops and the more loops I run, the more I get pissed off.” This is CLEARLY reconciliation, not some kind of inherent flaw in Q versus New Dawn. I mean, this is TEXTBOOK reconciliation, not even something to really discuss.
The official recommendation for Q says what? “… If you listen Monday – Friday, take Saturday and Sunday off. If you listen Sunday – Thursday, take Friday and Saturday off, and so forth. Do NOT skip these two rest days. Like going to the gym, your mind needs time to relax and process the subliminal scripting. Skipping these rest days can result in overload (fatigue and headaches), stonewalling (a total lack of results), or reconciliation (emotional turmoil associated with integrating the subliminal input with your current beliefs).”
New Dawn is weaker and takes more loops to get results. Everyone’s still used to “set and forget,” and many people are simply running too many loops.
Q hits deeper, hence the changes to the listening pattern. This is most likely the solution, not that Q has some kind of inherent flaw that makes it inferior to a very outdated build method. How do we know? Because we have the data and we’ve seen this occur over and over. People using too many loops, not understanding that with Q, you could run a title once every other day and still getting results, and then when reconciliation hits, allow their subconscious to play mental lawyer games, switching back to a much weaker (and less effective) build method to escape the scripting.
Believe me, don’t believe me – that’s up to you. At the end of the day, we’re not taking a step back in technology to resolve an issue that’s not really an issue. On the other hand, we’ve deliberately held back technology because of this same thing. We thought we could just release stuff with minor guidance and let people play in a mental sandbox, but we were wrong. Every time we turn around, someone’s improperly using titles and then we have to fight misinformation and when we point that out, we get accused of “blaming the consumer.”
Unfortunately, in this situation, it’s most certainly not the problem of the technology. We tested Q extensively before releasing it. We tested it privately AND publicly and saw nothing but good results. That Emperor Q test sub was probably the most dense sub we’ve ever made (which we did on purpose, we were trying to discover the limits).
If you prefer New Dawn, that’s fine. But, insinuating that we’ve made some kind of issue with Q is misinformation, and again, we won’t be going backward and making weaker titles.