@Skadoosh listened to WANTED for eight months, taking lots of action:
We need to remember that more advanced doesn’t always mean more effective (epsecially when combined with more other stuff like WB) —the AK-47 is a great example. The effectiveness of execution (the depth of results) depends primarily on our focus and effort.
I might use WB with DRR2 and a custom with GS + PS
If it helps?
I’m starting a new cycle using DRR2 and WB
The third title probably be my Genesis Mogul PS custom
I’m here for the best results I can get and not for running the most advanced scripting and cool stuff I don’t need. How about you? It seems that you’ve forgotten what @Fire had told you in your question thread, mate.
Have you tired WB for a long period?
And did you run DRR?
Yes, I’ve run it for six months with a two-month break in between. My results were splendid in terms of physical shifting and changing my wardrobe. You can see the shift here:
On top of that, WB helped me explore a part of my psyche I had no idea about; hence, I once called it a spiritual sub.
However, I’m running WANTED now, even though its physical shifting scripting is less advanced, simply because it’s more focused on physical shifts than WB and because WB has a lot of scripting I don’t need and some that I wouldn’t be able to execute yet, anyhow.
I’ve run DR once, but never in ZPv2 or the newest version. No other sub has changed my psychology as much as DR. These are my results after the first run (I’ve run it twice):
The second roumd made those results even more solid.
You grow wiser with sub use.
I agree its not anymore about flashy benefits but focused areas and not adding extra unnecessary scripts
I completely understand why you don’t feel the need for the full WB package.
That said, it sounds like you achieved impressive results with physical shifting using WB, making it difficult to compare which is “better” in that aspect.
If most of what WB offers isn’t relevant to you, I can see why you’d prefer Wanted instead.
My only issue with Wanted is that it feels too weak—more like a boy—whereas WB gives me the presence of a stronger, more alpha man.
That aside, Wanted is great, and I might try the OG version once it’s updated.
I wouldn’t break my WB cycle, though—I need to stay consistent. But I appreciate the suggestion!
It was not a suggestion or an attempt to dissuade you from using WB, but rather an attempt to fix the misunderstanding that could potentially dissuade people from running WANTED, where they could still greatly benefit from its physical shifting, achieve more optimal results, and avoid running superfluous scripting, which could potentially lead to unpleasant effects of reconciliation.
In particular, this misunderstanding:
Again, it’s not about any impressions but the real results we get from the scripting, like those of @Skadoosh that I posted above. It’s also not about how advanced the scripting is, since everyone who can read knows that WB has more advanced physical shifting scripting, but rather about our focus and effort when working toward our desired results.
The focus, effort, and amount of action required for WB are vastly more demanding than for WANTED. However, as you know, everyone can benefit from running WB to some extent, regardless of their baseline.
The punchline is: it’s always about optimizing the results, and simply running more advanced scripting doesn’t guarantee that. What truly matters is our focus, effort in taking action, and dedication to working with our sub. Skadoosh achieved all those splendid physical shifting results with WANTED because he did the real work.
If there’s anything that gives false impressions, it’s using more advanced (or superfluous) scripting while doing little to no work.
Another piece of advice I can give you is to listen to doers, not thinkers. Look at how someone works with their subs and what results they achieve. These are the real authorities in working with subs—not people whose reasoning may seem sound but is faulty at its core.
Don’t listen to anybody, really.
Edit:
@GoldenBird it was not ill meant, we all have our lessons to learn.
This post is one of the first results of mine on the new Executive, btw. I’ve been so productive, indeed.
Can confirm, am results
Thats is !!!
People think ohhh I just listen to the sub sit back and all will go well. Life is not a bowl of fruit.
You think a blonde with big boobs is going to knock on your door and proclaim her undying love to you. Then you fly off to some beach resort and get married at sun set ? be doer not a thinker.
You think if you can run Mckennas Gold dollars.will rain down upon you ?.
@Sub.Zero is correct !!
My theme song on WANTED
Mine:
From my journal:
The plan was to stack wanted with hero but now new daredevil is coming soon who knows.
Anyone tried wanted og with khan?
Would you mind sharing your listening schedule?
Do you use micro loops?
If not, how long do you typically listen to each title?
Based on the micro loop ideas you’ve shared with me, I’ve noticed that even listening to just 8 minutes of certain titles can trigger reconciliation. It’s so subtle that I didn’t realize it at first. Looking back, I can see that I’ve gone through cycles of reconciliation without being as effective as I could have been.
Also, I’ve found that using affirmations becomes nearly impossible when the subconscious is overloaded.
My goal now is to integrate affirmations into my subliminal stack to get the best of both worlds. I’m going to experiment with 30-second micro loops and see how that goes.
I listen to my stack after waking up. Three titles. Two days on, one day off. I take longer breaks if necessary due to recon or overload.
I’ve never used microloops, and I’m not going to because I don’t need them. I can handle a huge amount of exposure—far beyond my current schedule—with little to no recon. However, I’ve discovered that exposure time follows a pattern similar to the Pareto Principle, so I stick to my schedule.
No more than 15 miutes a day.
The point of using microloops is to ease gradually into listening for longer periods, up to listening to the whole script. However, I’ve seen people use microloops without that intent, as they were satisfied with their results.
You could try this, too:
Can you elaborate on that?