Let me put it this way…
Are you going to try cramming this whole sandwich at once or eat it bite by bite?
21 Likes
If i’m hungry, that thing is GONE 
.
7 Likes
Woah. Woah. I would eat it all at once. I am hungry right now. Thanks for the inspiration.
2 Likes
@SaintSovereign @Fire and everyone on the forum, I apologize for projecting my own impatience and frustration on you all
9 Likes
sometimes 3, sometimes 4. depending on how much i feel like doing.
right now I’m microlooping WB twice in a cycle and slowly building it up from there.
My schedule is also a bit different, I have 2 rest periods in a cycle.
1 listen
2
3 listen
4
5
6 listen
7
8 listen
9
10
11
12
13
14 listen
15
16 listen
17
18
19 listen
20
21 listen
22
23
24
25
26
or
1 listen
2
3 listen
4
5 listen
6
7 listen
8
9 listen
10
11
12
13
14 listen
15
16 listen
17
18 listen
19
20 listen
21
22 listen
23
24
25
26
sometimes i tweak them, but i use either one of these 2 schedules most of the time
1 Like
And for those who don’t know, @Viktor worked out this schedule meticulously.
He used subs he knew very well from listening to them for many cycles and changed and tweaked the schedule, listening to his feelings, how the subs worked etc, until it was fitting his needs as good as possible.
That doesn’t mean, it will be the best method for everyone.
I fear, everyone needs to do this work himself. Perhaps even over and over with new stacks.
4 Likes
For what I’m working on doing now I will stick with Index Gate for thirty seconds and probably follow your first schedule for one cycle to start. I really want to run Genesis Mogul but I have hit a small plateau with what I’m trying to learn with CSS and because Index Gate has NWE in it that it should take priority
2 Likes
I was just watching something about how patience is a super power and it’s obvious I need to develop that so I’m going to somehow make that a reality for myself. I’m not giving up on my goals or what I would like to accomplish or achieve. I’m going to try to accept that whatever it is will take whatever time it takes. If that makes sense?
1 Like
Hi @Fire @AnswerGroup Thanks for your insights. Incorporated the 30s listening schedule. Does this also apply to custom. Say a custom with 20 modules, can we follow the same 30s schedule without reducing the results. Apologies if it’s another redundant question.
2 Likes
I really want to know this as well 
30s enough, or would we start at 60s, still increasing listening time by 30s from there until we find the sweet spot?
2 Likes
I had the very same question.
1 Like
Customs are a bit different by their nature – the script is largely front-loaded, meaning you don’t get as much of a separation of “stages” as the major titles. Working your way up to 5 minutes should be acceptable to get the entire script. Starting with 60s is fine, but 30s if you have recon.
EDIT: Note, the “cores” however, are split by the mini-stages. It’s the modules that we can’t really do like that.
12 Likes
They are not. NSE repeats fairly often.
3 Likes
@SaintSovereign : If we have a 20 - module custom, does the order of the cores and modules matter?
1 Like
It does not. Try not to overthink this, everyone.
7 Likes
Does this mean that with a custom, listening to 60s will give you the “4-stager experience” with the cores, but not the modules, ie we can be confident that we’d get exposure to the cores but not all the modules?
I’d be TOTALLY fine with that. That’d actually be good, in all honesty, as it would allow you to work your way up to a 20 module custom level of exposure
Amazing what’s in your tech.