I don’t think anyone here is asking for Stark to fundamentally change. Just asking for it to be upgraded heavily, and maybe a crystal clear objectives page that doesn’t feel vague/incomplete.
Emperor and Stark are by far my favorite titles, I don’t know where that was lost in translation here.
Fame, Innovation, Charm, Charisma, Persuasiveness.
Where’s the confusion?
But that isn’t all the title does…
You’re referring to…
I swear some of you think this guy is a hyperdominant alpha male when in reality he is just a scared child with magical powers and a light saber.
Depends on the title and the situation. “Dominance” in the board room isn’t the same as “dominance” in the bedroom. It’s situational. The common theme between all the situations, however, is the ability to make things by exerting power or influence over those around you. That doesn’t have to be the caveman “fear-based” dominance, where people comply for fear of punishment.
The issue with this type of “dominance” is that the people around you are ONLY complying because they don’t want to experience anything painful. As soon as they get the chance to band together and take you out, they will do so – without fail. It is an inevitability, almost a quirk in the pattern of the human psyche that that everyone always wants to “kill the king” and take the crown for themselves. And if you’re going around beating people over the head because of your “dominance,” that is going to occur FASTER.
As I said in another thread:
You are not walking into a room with investors and getting the investment out of fear. The people screaming for “moar dominance” have never actually worked with this crowd. Understand that these people need NOTHING from you. There’s so many good ideas and pitches that they are looking for ANY reason to say no.
Take a look at this clip from a recent episode of Shark Tank:
For those who don’t want to watch, Mark Cuban owns the Mavericks, a basketball team. He’s also a HUGE basketball fan, hence why he bought the team. The individuals looking for an investment “invented” some air fresheners in the shape of the NBA team logos or something like that. Anyway, as a “joke” / sly diss, they decided to give Mark Cuban the air freshener of the team that beat the Mavericks in some championship.
Mark did not respond well to this and immediately said he would NOT be investing. The other sharks all jumped on him, and as you can see from clip, he gave NO shits because he’s a billionaire and doesn’t have to give a shit.
If you think you’re going to walk into an investment firm and “out alpha” these individuals because of your hyperdominance, you are surely mistaken. And we are not going to compromise Stark because a few people want kitchensink subliminals so they can pack their stack.
I mean it’s simple
Just compare Emperor, Khan, Emperor: House of Medici (major titles on the catalog) and then look at Stark
Pretty much answers your question
This sounds like you are unable to identify a specific point that you wish to be addressed. I just spent some time scrolling up this thread to try to give you the benefit of the doubt. But I cannot find one line in which you’ve identified an actual concept.
I’m not saying you need to go into exhaustive detail. But do you have any specific domain that you want to be addressed in the program description? Or do you just want a longer list with more bullet points?
I don’t have a specific point that I am trying to make.
I am merely providing feedback that the description of Stark is extremely vague, and feels unfinished.
Beyond that I have nothing else to bring up.
The title feels incomplete.
That will probably change during the upgrade. I am just hoping for crystal clear, detailed descriptions so we know what objectives to focus on, what objectives to consciously avoid, so on and so forth.
Okay.
And regarding this point?
Was there any specific (or ballpark) concept that you had in mind when you wrote this?
I’m asking because I’ve tried (and failed, so far) to guess what it might be.
Well seeing as we don’t know what the scripting actually includes, it would be a guessing game, and I’m not really interested in that thought experiment.
I’ve stated my feedback, I’ll leave it at that.
Perfect example there is no out alpha when it comes to VCs
Some people really need to run LBFH and Regeneration for a looooooong time. That “give me more dominance” stuff is just a cry for help from people walking around with unresolved issues. More dominance isn’t going to fix unresolved fear or deeply rooted feelings of inadequacy.
I thought that you might possibly have run the program and had some experiential, anecdotal results or manifestations that caused you to be dissatisfied with the Program Description.
That seems to not be the case.
For my part, I have run Stark in the past for about 16 months. First month alone, and then after that as one module in a larger custom subliminal.
In that time, I experienced some (not all) of the potential expressions of the Stark archetype. (The Starchetype? Forgive me. I’m a dad.)
In other words, the description and objectives even in their (for you) truncated form, went beyond what I needed. haha.
But that’s my own experience and it does not negate your experiences or your preferences.
I think I can see your point here;
but, again for contrast,
I would say that we could also take the precisely opposite view and say that the actual problem is that Conscious Guidance is really way too easy. For both beginners and advanced users.
We sometimes express those aspects of a program’s archetype that are easiest and most accessible to us. And this is strongly guided by our habitual choices and commitments.
Driving down familiar paths and lanes, we never learn what the car can do when we take it off-road. And that’s a big part of what conscious guidance entails. Simply trying to do the things that will take us in our desired directions.
Every Objectives list ends with the same phrase, “…and much more”. Stark has 9 bulletpoints. Medici has 29 bulletpoints; Emperor has 33. And they all end the same way. It’s not simply sales-copy hyperbole.
None of the Objectives lists is exhaustive. Because the subs can all be taken in different directions and to new heights based on the life choices that you make and the direction that you choose to explore.
But sure, Stark does have fewer bulletpoints than average on its Objectives list.
Instead of talking about how “smart” anyone is, or about “confusion surrounding the title”, a better approach would be to just go over to the Subliminal Club Roadmap page that is there for this purpose, and put in a normal, formal request to have more ideas and bulletpoints added to the Stark Objectives list.
I’ve actually probably ran Stark longer than anyone on this forum, or at least top 3.
Think total time is around 14 months.
I didn’t read all of this, but you’re probably right.
I’m sure my concerns have been heard and I look forward to the updated version of Stark.
Again, it is one of my favorite titles 
It’s a great title!
I’ve been running it for almost 3 years now since April 2020 so I shall take that spot😎
Total time around 26 months.
And yet you want a longer Objectives list?
Sorry. Sorry.
I couldn’t resist. It was just sitting right there. 
p.s.
whoa.
Oh you got me beat there. But I respect the hell out of that consistency
