Depends on the situation. I’ve come a long way.
Why?
I am talking about the notion of inner ‘control’ brings to the fore the balance between allowing the subconscious to act freely and exerting conscious control. A notable pattern among individuals struggling to manifest their desires through the alchemical process – specifically, the methods of intent and journaling and such – is a tension between these two forces.
Consider the analogy of a swing, where the subconscious mind is the swing itself, and the conscious mind is the individual sitting upon it. The dynamics between them can be likened to the grip with which one holds the chains of the swing. A tight, controlling grip can stifle the swing’s motion, making it slow and restrained. In contrast, a relaxed, trusting grip can let the swing soar high and with vigor.
This interplay reflects the relationship between our conscious and subconscious minds. A heavy-handed approach from our conscious mind can limit the potential of the subconscious. On the other hand, trusting the subconscious and allowing it the freedom to express and act can lead to greater heights and successes. The challenge lies in finding the equilibrium, the perfect grip, that allows both parts of our mind to flourish.
If this resonates with any of you, here is a question to explore: What unfolds when you simply observe, without the intention to steer?
4 Likes
Beautiful. I’d love to hear more about this.
insightful share
2 Likes
Has anyone tried doing a Dopamine Detox while running Stark?
For Stark
For anyone who has run Stark. Is there Alpha scripting like emperor or ascension? Is there a physical shifting scripting? Is there any confidence scripting? Lastly and romance/sexual scripting?
Just trying to get a feel for how this compares to Emperor or Ascension. If this is mostly aura based or has a wider spectrum. I only have room for one more title in my current stack.
Yes. Yes. Yes. And yes. 
People keep claiming that it doesn’t feel as “masculine,” but the fact of the matter is that it’s focused on becoming an innovative and charismatic leader as opposed to Emperor’s hyper dominance. Rest assured, you won’t get run over when running Stark.
19 Likes
@SaintSovereign thanks for the insight. I’m picking Stark. Wonder if Stark will be updated with the NWE or NRE
Any title with wealth or romance scripting will be updated.
2 Likes
This is going to be a powerhouse incredible title, so excited!!!
3 Likes
Even HoM will get NRE which will be interesting.
4 Likes
Social skills on HoM vs Stark.
1 Like
I strongly disagree and would absolutely hate to see this being a male-exclusive title.
My partner has been using this very successfully for the past 4 months to become a full-time streamer and now she enjoys enough income to replace both her previous job with even more left over. She’s become more charming, figured out innovative ways to improve her streaming experience through exclusive benefits and I have not gotten the sense that she is masculine in the slightest. If anything she’s even more feminine.
Not only that but just today she received a lucrative part-time job offer with potential for ownership through one of her viewers, which is bound to increase her income even further. (Stark + R.I.C.H)
I’ve seen people both say this sub is too masculine and not masculine enough. I suggest to just leave it alone as is to not affect the rest of us. @SaintSovereign I hope you take my testimonial in consideration when further developing this title.
19 Likes
Oh, you’ve seen the script?
8 Likes
Mic drop 
4 Likes
You see, once upon a time Tony Stark was heterosexual, straight, male.
These modern days, Netflix era, requires modern solutions, right?
Tony can be a Tonya or somebody else. He/him can be she/him or even them/they 
(Harsh joke. No offense intended, though).
On a serious note: issues with Stark being “not enough masculine” is, well, an issue.
Its an users feedback, right? It can be ignored (like any shadow energy form) or taken in consideration.
4 Likes
I am fine with Stark not being an inherently masculine title but rather a focused, driven, highly intelligent innovator technologist (which could be applicable to both genders) while masculinity could be amplified using GLM:TC.
My issue with Stark in its current iteration is the objectives are extremely vague, unclear, and seems like it’s incomplete overall… plus it’s power is WAY down compared to every new title, and most of the existing alpha titles such as Emperor.
And this is coming from the perspective of someone who has ran Emperor & Stark extensively (over a year in total)
I am extremely hopeful that within the next cycle we get to see massive improvements to the core titles on the store (Emperor, Stark, and Khan (not relevant to me) ) and possibly an even darker focused Stark title, maybe Stark Black with more Lex Luthor vibes.
5 Likes
I agree. If Stark was being called Innovator ZP (for example) nobody would give a shit about it being specified as ‘any gender’, right?
Just like seems nobody gives a feedback about The Alchemist being ‘any gender’.
Stark, especially Tony Stark being ‘any gender’ is like Marilyn Monroe physical beautification sub positioned as “any gender”.
@SaintSovereign, please, forgive us for being not enough tolerant 
most us came from countries with a fixed gender roles.
Tony Stark was a straight-guy, and “any gender” specified with concrete masculine archetype sounds like “bi-sexual”
Anyway, I FEEL that @Fire is already know why this kind of feedback is arising in the forum and I’m 100% he preparing something incredible new for us all! Next version of Stark specifically.
DISCLAIMER: ITS A FEEDBACK. Somebody can react to it as ‘personal assault’ or something but all of this is a feedback.
Concerning, ‘vague’ and etc. well, SC guys are surprising us with incredible new ideas and products with each launch. Updated Stark will be something out of this world, I’m sure.
4 Likes
Why you do not like Khan?