This is the flagship program of the Zero Point Preview. Ya’ll really think that we made a shallow, surface level alpha leadership program? 
There’s also a lot of personal assumptions in these questions. For example, the notion that a purely inspirational leader can’t be “effective.” Or, that a leader has to work as hard or harder than the people they’re leading?
Uhhh, why?
I’ve led multiple successful teams for various organizations. This is the first time that I’ve actually worked harder than my team (outside of @Fire). In my industry (marketing and product development), it’s my job to make strategic decisions, as well as communicate those decisions to stakeholders and get them on board. That means I spent a lot of time either looking at data or playing office politics, while my team did all the grunt work like data collection, reports, etc.
In one of these jobs that I had, circa 2014, my managerial position was infinitely easier than theirs, and yet I had the respect of the entire team and we had success after success after success. Why? Because I did mine very well. I made incredibly strategic decisions that led to success, all of their projects were approved, they saw tangible results that they could put on their resumes and when they left the company, they always got crazy high paying positions.
The notion that in every leadership position, you HAVE to work harder than those you lead is limiting. And how does one qualify who is working harder anyway? Using my industry again, my KPI is usually overall revenue. My staff’s KPI was something else entirely, something directly correlated to their level of output. Who can say that writing a ton of reports is easier than dealing with office politics (especially to a hard introvert like me)? There were many times that I wanted to do their jobs instead of mine, because I’m outstanding at data collection and analysis. I could finish a day’s worth of work in half the time and spend the rest pretending to work, lol.
Working more “effectively” is a productivity issue, not a leadership issue. Chosen focuses on developing good leaders, and while it has scripting to improve productivity and achieving goals, it’s not on the forefront because that’s not a universal indicator of what makes a good leader. Inspiring your team to action, bringing out the best in them, hardening yourself against negativity so that you can protect your team from office politics, being honorable, etc. ARE universal qualities of a good leader.