No. No. No. Hell no.
We’re not taking our technology backward because of @Hermit’s pet theories that subliminals go beyond the subconscious into the infinite where your higher selves must faciliate the request and it’s omg just too POWERFUL, or whatever. To me, it is the highest form of arrogance to think that because you overestimated your capacity to listen to a stack and are now going through reconciliation that there’s something wrong with the technology and we should literally make it weaker. And then, you have the audacity to try and rile up other members and convince them that you know more than we do about the topic. You ordered those customs exactly ONE WEEK ago. I doubt you have had the time to experiment with different listening schedules, or even taken rest days. They are exceptionally dense and full of the most potent modules we have available. You overestimated your ability to listen to these two customs and now you’re blaming the technology rather than the fact that you simply can’t handle it.
We issued new listening guidelines as a starting point. If you can’t handle 1 loop every other day, then switch it to 1 loop every two days (or more) until you find your sweet spot. That’s the solution, not for us to dumb down the technology.
There is nothing wrong with Qv2 or Ultima v2. Absolutely nothing.
Here’s what’s actually happening: there’s a subset of people who like to ignore the recommendations at every turn because they think they know more than us. They play lawyer games with what we say, trying to find ways to “optimize listening time” by subtly redefining what we’re saying. We say, “you can use Ultima as a booster,” and then they’ll ask question after question about what constitutes using Ultima as a booster in an attempt to figure out how they can sneak in more loops. Go check out the new listening guidelines thread and you’ll see exactly what I mean.
We keep saying over and over, as the technology improves, less listening time is necessary – even to the point that some people will get results at 1-2 loops per WEEK. What does everyone do? Keep listening at high levels, then complaining about the reconciliation.
@Hermit – you need to drop the ego and stop pretending that you know more about the situation than we do. You also need to realize that you may not be as resilient as you thought. You’re literally frustrated with the fact that you can’t brute force your subconscious like you used to and taking it personally. Rather than admitting that and CUTTING BACK ON THE LOOPS to find your sweet spot until you can add to the number of loops again, you’re trying to convince us that it’s a failing of the technology.
Guys, we finished Qv2 way back in like FEBRUARY and have been testing it since then. Guess what? Our paid, private testers, who follow all the instructions perfectly because that’s how they get paid, had NO PROBLEMS with Qv2. Why? Because they weren’t lying to themselves about how much they could handle.
Enough of this “Qv2 is just too strong” mess. Cut back on the number of loops. Start with 1 loop every three days if you have to. It’s time to understand that with the progression of our technology, you no longer have to listen non-stop to get results, and that’s a GOOD thing.
Now, if you have alternate listening schedules or ideas that you want to suggest, we are open to it and will even promote them on the upcoming listening instructions article as a community driven effort. But, any thread claiming Qv2 is fundamentally flawed because iT’s ToO sTrOnG is wrong. This is not a subjective thing. You are objectively wrong because we have extensively tested this for months before we launched it. Cut back on the loops.
Q+ is going to be even stronger and may require one loop a week. That is the goal. We are not going back to asking people to spend half their day listening to their stack. Not only that… ya’ll wanna know why full automation is taking so long? It’s because we asked our programmer to also build in the framework for the next evolution of Q: voice embedding. By that, we mean you’ll be able to upload a recording of your voice and Q will create a voice print from that and your subliminals will then be in YOUR OWN VOICE. That will significantly reduce reconciliation while making the subs powerful. We are also clearly working on the problem of reconciliation, as seen in the open bounty thread under Subliminal Club labs.
So, no. We will not be making our technology weaker. We will not go backward. We are going to march forward and create the world’s most effective subliminals that are accessible in cost, accessible in the fact you don’t have to listen for six hours a day, and accessible in the fact that anyone can use them.