Completely understandable. Especially if there is a title that is working on some deep blockages and you listen to it before sleep.
I could understand how your schedule and everything makes it difficult. Easier said than done but try to be more patient with yourself and try to give yourself some kudos for trying to work through your hurdles.
Well, microloops can be as short as 10 seconds if the title is difficult to run for the user. Saint mentioned that in some thread, I don’t remember exactly.
That was the official answer from support when I asked about clarification about micro loop length. 30 seconds to 2:59.
Of course you can go lower.
And still get bombastic results.
That led me to call shorter loops quantum loops. Something smaller than micro.
I think @William who uses these kind of short loops pretty often has his own name for them.
What about running your main titles for the full 15 mins 3 days a week and then doing 15 second micro loops twice a week ? Would that still be over exposure?
This is how it has been going for me for the past few months:
Listening length: mostly <15s for DRR3 & WB, <30s for EE. I can’t get lower than this. I even resetted the playtime lower a few times.
I found myself unable to finish the new cycle without a sub that has no anti recon (before EE got updated). But now my results have been more consistent with less funny businesses after I took a 5 day break (the first quote) from the subs that haven’t been updated with anti recon, independent from EE.
…
EE DRR3 WB
EE DRR3 WB
EE
EE
EE DRR3 WB
EE DRR3 WB
…
Nothing conclusive yet. I need to get to the end of this cycle before I can say anything conclusive. But for now, either the anti recon or the break (or both) have been working so well that the results from DRR3 & WB have been noticeably better & more consistent than the last cycle when I tried the new experimental schedule.
I’m confused, are you saying that after overusing WB you saw no effect but when you didn’t listen to it for a while and then read the product description again got instant results? Or did you listen to it again at 30 seconds and got instant results?
I wouldn’t get too hung up on this. It’s 30 listening days for a cycle, and with the flexibility to take longer or shorter rest days in between listening days, a cycle can vary in length.
You can do this with the older tech IF you are using the progressive microloop strategy. We have spread that ALL throughout the manual. Only if you are genuinely using the microloop strategy, since we’ve been doing microloops tech for quite some time now.
Anti-recon and adaptive scripting are relatively new, but the microloop build existed long before we publicly started urging people to use microloops.
So did this change?
Because in the new official listening instructions it’s back to the old split model.
I’m doing pretty fine with my recent stack of KB1, QL1 and a Ascension+LB custom.
When recon kicked from the custom I just decrease old the overall listening time.
@Parsifal this has been updated to prepare everyone for the upcoming releases that will be the 1st ZPU titles
Since you are listening to non ZPU titles than stick to what works for you. I had just started a new stack on Feb 1 (I added a new title to my previous 2 title stack) and was listening to all 3 at once on listening day. With this updated listening manual I thought I somehow got my information wrong, but I didn’t.
So just understand, the listening instructions are preparing us for the upcoming ZPU titles and to work out any confusion on the new listening instructions. Just keep the new listening instruction in mind if you are going to add upcoming ZPU releases to your future stack.