My bible of a post has been erased lol 

Probably for the best…my bottom line is
Just addressing the content and not the character of anyone is important here imo. Opinions and views may differ but were all on the same side of this journey.
The title of this thread is polarizing and potentially controversial, and there is nothing wrong with that.
IMO and I could say it could objectively lands as, but is not objectively accusatory, implying something pejorative, as either a lack of awareness or intent.
A more neutral inquiry would be something like ’ will woman be getting more specific titles for them?’ or ‘let’s get more female specific titles for the woman who could and would want to benefit’ or ‘new sub titles for woman’
My read on this is no one is arguing or against that. They are polarized by the thread title, specifically the term neglect.
To have a polarizing response back seems quite reasonable. And at no point should it be made ad hominem. If it’s kept like that we can be free to discuss anything constructively, providing it doesn’t violate ‘house rules’
That said my sense is SC is currently targeting a male marketing segment (let’s be real here-Alchemist, spartan, to Khan were up leveling our real life D&D levels) and whether they choose to continue to do that or not is not right or wrong. (Although they did trade the jacked dude and red car in for a colorful brain ! so who knows lol ) It’s artistic choice and business choice.