The issue is not with men having requirements.
The issue is with having requirements for the wrong reasons.
If the requirement is for her to stay home and not travel because the man is afraid that she will cheat, then there is no logical reason behind this requirement. It is completely based on projected fear (a wrong reason).
The man is forbidding her to travel because of his own fears of what she might eventually do and that he would never know whether she ever did so.
According to him, she must stay home, not because South America is dangerous and he wants to protect her (a logical reason), but because he does not trust her with having control over he own sexual choices and the strength of their relationship (fear based reasons).
This overly strict requirement in this case is only there because there is a trust issue in the first place. If there is no trust, then the relationship is not that deep in the first place. No real trust also means there is no real love.
If a man is afraid that his woman will cheat on him, then this will never be a healthy relationship, independent of how strict or loose the requirements and standards are. This is because the relationship is build on mistrust in the first place. This mistrust then compensates with overly strict irrational requirements and standards.
In this scenario, the man is asking her to give up her life-long dream of travelling so that he can feel secure in the knowing that she never cheated while traveling.
A relationship that is not built on trust, but on control, cannot not operate as a healthy relationship.
Men (and women) who have their requirments and standards based on fear and control, will never experience a really deep and fullfilling relationship, because the very enforcement of those fear based requirements will always be stronger than the level of trust.
No trust = no true intimacy = superficial relationship
Insecure men seek control over their women through such rigid requirements, but in the end it does not matter how strict or how loose the requirement is.
No trust means no trust. Period.
Therefore, if the requirement is created for the wrong reasons, in this case in order to cope for the man’s own fears and lack of trust, then these requirements are exactly that which will kill the relationship in the first place.
These wrong requirements are not being made to amplify the trust in the relationship, but to compensate for the lack of trust.
Relationship requirements created for the wrong reasons will kill a relationship before it even started.
Relationships that operate on these types of requirements for the wrong reasons, are purely transactional.
…which most traditional relationships were in the past for sure and these relationships worked for society as a whole, but the people inside those relationships weren’t happy and fullfilled most of the time. Relationships built on such compensational requirements are artificial constructs and these constructs are not based on trust but on enforcing standards to “keep everyone within their assigned role”.
The issue is not with men having requirements and standards.
The issue is with having requirements for the wrong reasons.
These requirements and standards shall never be coping mechanisms for one’s own insecurities.