Main Disc. Thread - Emperor: The House of Medici

[Azriel]

SaintSovereignCo-Founder, Subliminal Club

Aug 7

Azriel:

I was just thinking, would PCC need to be run alongside this or does this have elements of PCC covered.

Medici has elements of PCC, geared toward the goals of the program. If you want to feel the “full effects,” run PCC as part of a stack. PCC is somewhat “defensive,” while The House of Medici is a more “aggressive” script, so the two didn’t quite gel.

@SaintSovereign

can you say any more about how PCC and HOM don’t gel, will it diminish the effectiveness, or just requires more intentional navigation?

I’ve been running HOM in my stack to good effect, but recently I brokered a connection with millions in business on the fly, based off trust and relationship, and then after had a sinking sense and realized I didn’t get anything in writing ahead of time. This is a really stupid mistake on my part lol but in the spirit of what was happening, waiting to press for or work out legal stuff would have cost a lot of business. I have not been ‘screwed over’ yet and it might be nothing but In light of this I was considering stacking PCC or putting the two together in a custom as my ‘offense’ may be in need of some ‘defense’ Will PCC slow down the capacity of HOM etc?

[joefso]

Would like to know the answer to Azriel his question, if you could answer @SaintSovereign that would be great!

Does PPC jive well with HOM? Will it enhance the development of acquiring power and influence?

[mecharc]

From Description of HOM:

“If you’re a trader (day trading or growth investor), salesperson, entrepreneur — this one’s for you. Stacks well with all of our wealth building titles”

Will this stack well with (keep reasonable density)
Mogul Q and Limitless Q in regards to helping me with business other than financial markets?

[WiseWalker]

Interesting, I’d be eager to try this out but before that, may I asked what’s the module running within The House of Medici? In the origins of the Emperor module, we get a rundown of what is within it, and in this what would be it? @SaintSovereign

[James]

I ran Medici for a couple of loops when it was first released and @SaintSovereign isn’t joking when he said it’s offense instead of defense like PPC. I had no problem shutting people down.

[Sub.Zero]

I found HOM quite dominant. It was much easier to manage my relationship and people were more respectful. I had an impression there was an alpha programming element in it. I played it for 4 days in total only.

[Apollo]

I’ve been thinking of getting EQ with Daredevil and PS, but it seems like this might be a better candidate for me, based on your observations. I’m not sure if adding PS to EQ and HoM would be beneficial or too much.

[Azriel]

I have found, stacking creates a smoother, as in subtler but still there, but fuller overall effect, but if one is looking for results and fast the less the better. EQ and HOM would be more than enough for a satisfactory dating life, you can add Libertine for some extra sauce as needed. But if your looking to full out ‘game’ or be sleeping around a ton proactively-PS

[King]

How about stacking EQ and HOM in 10-module custom in Terminus.

Do you think that will work fast?

[Azriel]

Yes, I think that would work fast especially if some or most of those modules were results enhancers or similar to what you’ve run in the past.

For fastest consistent results I would run it exactly as mentioned for running single stage title. 1 loop 1x a day for 5 days/ 2 days off 2 loops every other day for 5 days/ 2 days off etc… I believe is anyone is running Terminus over 3 loops a day they are costing themselves a ton of results, I may even say 2. It just leads to a super overt uncomfortable reconciliation or a super subtle one, where everything feels ok but nothings happening.

[Malkuth]

I believe is anyone is running Terminus over 3 loops a day they are costing themselves a ton of results, I may even say 2. It just leads to a super overt uncomfortable reconciliation or a super subtle one, where everything feels ok but nothings happening.

I’m wondering about developmental effects over the long-term. And strategies over the long-term.

I still feel that the main factor impacting reconciliation is Action. I suspect, for example, that action taking is the optimal strategy for lessening reconciliation with a heavy stack.

I’m also coming to suspect that capacity to take Action is the critical factor (or one of them) in deciding whether to run a Terminus track.

The Terminus tracks that have worked best for me also seem to be the ones for areas in which I’ve taken more action.

I’m still thinking about this.

[Sub.Zero]

Yes, I think that would work fast especially if some or most of those modules were results enhancers or similar to what you’ve run in the past.

For fastest consistent results I would run it exactly as mentioned for running single stage title. 1 loop 1x a day for 5 days/ 2 days off 2 loops every other day for 5 days/ 2 days off etc… I believe is anyone is running Terminus over 3 loops a day they are costing themselves a ton of results, I may even say 2. It just leads to a super overt uncomfortable reconciliation or a super subtle one, where everything feels ok but nothings happening.

I totally agree with that, when I was running 3 loops/day I was stonewalling and got a a nasty reconciliation from time to time. It seemed to work good only on 1 loop/day and even 1 loop felt a bit too much. It’s an individual matter I guess anyway but he numbers given by @Azriel look pretty reasonable to me.

[Azriel]

I still feel that the main factor impacting reconciliation is Action. I suspect, for example, that action taking is the optimal strategy for lessening reconciliation with a heavy stack.

I can’t imagine this is not the case. However terminus seems to test the limits of a physical capacity to assimilate the script. So even with action, some of the processing gets ‘qued’ and over loading the que seems to create adverse effects even with plenty of action. I believe the unifying ‘sigil’ of your heavy stack, or in general, unifying purpose/understanding of direction and growth also greatly reduces reconciliation.

I think there is reconciliation that is as it sounds reconciling new beliefs with current status and there is reconciliation from over doing processing capacity. Action helps both but has it’s limits on the later.

I have also found terminus tracks need even less conscious actions than Q .
I almost can’t help but take actions in accordance with the Emperor tracks, even if it is against my better judgement. Like short-changing work communication cause there is no future there to work on other things etc. I’ve become a bit fearless about doing what’s important or what I am actually committed to over ‘what I should do’. This kind of action was more difficult for me before Terminus

[Sub.Zero]

When I was getting a nasty reconciliation from using StarkT which was some form of social anxiety the only way to get out of it was taking action = socialization.

[WiseWalker]

Treat it as if you are consuming a vitamin. Everyday 1 dose, done. Then, go about your day working out things that you are passionate in. Results purely derived from your disciplinary act.

[Azriel]

cool, good summation

[Azriel]

it would help with developing the right relationships that could serve that, but PCC but would better in a competitive work environment IMO. That’s where it will really shine. Its a balance of demonstrating likeability, charisma, competence, potential, while never outshining ‘the master’.

[mecharc]

So, maybe stack PCC after running this stack of three programs for sometime?

[mecharc]

StarkQ focuses on entrepreneurship via innovation and / or inventing things. Emperor is that all around lone wolf entrepreneur. EoG is for long-term wealth building. And by wealth, we mean millions

What would you say for ascended Mogul?

[Hermit]

Is anyone willing to describe its experience with Transcendental Connection?