Precisely, I don’t question that sexual attraction is triggered mostly by masculine men but I destroy the assumption that it’s essential to be successful with women since Peter Pan fucks beautiful and quality women too.
The most essential distinction here is the one between sexual attraction and seduction. Sexual attraction is biological whilst seduction is artificial to some point (since it’s an art, yet based on our natural predisposition to mate).
PUA is all about seduction yet where it fails the most is not taking into account women’s unique psychological makeup and desires, but teaching men to follow “proven” routines mindlessly as if women were automatons whose “usage” requires following a set of instructions.
Seduction is not a set of routines but leading women astray, far from the mundane and into their fantasies by the promise of their fulfilment, and that implies building up their desire gradually to the point where it transforms into the lust for the one who is “making the promise”. The key to seduction is recognising their psychology and fantasies and making the “promise”, luring them further into the “snares” of our seduction by making them believe it, and experience it as a journey to a culmination point (the sex, of course). Choosing the right woman is essential for both parties, however. You can’t seduce everyone. Choosing a woman susceptible to your charm is vital.
On the other hand, sexual attraction makes no distinction of this sort, it’s barely conscious in its execution. There’s no choice. You either feel it or not. Seduction is a choice, always. Women want to be seduced, so do we.