Push Back time:
You’re leaving things really vague.
That makes it much easier to keep moving the goal posts and feeling intensely dissatisfied to the point of crisis.
What’s actually at stake here?
What are you specifically “missing out on”?
It would probably be useful for you to apply discipline to identifying/labeling your feelings, perceptions, and evaluations, and placing them into specific, actual contexts.
In other words:
NOT: “Life is so tough and no one really cares about anyone else”
But instead: “When Joseph looked at me with that blank, unresponsive facial expression, I felt a mixture of sadness, irritation, and fear of rejection”.
NOT: “Nothing ever works for me and my life isn’t going anywhere”
But instead: “As I anticipate getting into another work-week, I’m feeling a sense of dread about the interactions and boundary violations I may have to deal with”
Or even better, “I’m thinking about responding to Q&As from the management team tomorrow and I’m feeling scared and overwhelmed.”
The main reason we create overwhelming, blanket generalizations about “life” is actually pretty mundane… We’re cutting corners.
Who wants to catalog and describe every grain of sand on the beach? Just say “it’s freaking sandy”.
A reasonable approach…
But only when things are reasonably fine.
When it comes to dealing with bad shit that lasts more than a day or two, it’s better to get granular. Because at that point our reasonable generalizations begin to accumulate and pile-up, and they become unreasonable. The inaccuracies and uselessness in our generalizations begins to compete with and overcome their accuracies and utility.
Your mind’s going to keep generalizing unless you rein it in. Generalization is a neurological talent, and it’s a good one… Until it’s not.
You’re intelligent and perceptive enough that all of your observations are going to basically be on-point. But that will make it easier for you to overlook the limits and the edges of their accuracy.
“It’s basically accurate.”
and
“It might as well be accurate.”
are not the same as, ‘It is completely accurate.’