bro is the most healed person on this planet by now
1 Like
Honestly, even after that much time, DRR is still as potent at its healing as ever. I’m nowhere near a point of feeling that I’m getting diminishing returns from the sub yet.
EE 35s DRR3 16s WB 17s
OH I GET IT.
Something, somehow, there was a mental block that made me hard to notice that I was being overprotective with my subconscious.
“My subconscious is weak so i have to protect it from misleading suggestions.” Fearing that they would be “real” if I don’t refute & fight the wrong information in my head.
That thought pattern, I’m already aware of, but something was blocking me to notice/acknowledge the depth of how much it has been rooted in my way of thinking, affecting many aspects of my life.
Now I know.
I can point at the cases in the past that resulted in this too.
DRR3 is working overtime, isn’t it? lol.
Ever since it “clicked” a few months ago, it has been blitzing thoroughly through many points that need healing. It’s ripping out the duct tapes and applying real fixes.
Now the game plan:
increasing the trust in myself that my subconscious is strong enough to filter out negative suggestions and do the right thing.
Foundational work.
I wish to use DRR3 as long as possible, but I’m willing to disrupt my stack for this. I think this is worthwhile to pursue.
I wonder if DRR3 is still good enough to sweep the foundation, or is it better if I switch to stage 4, maybe even restart from 1?
I’ll ask support too.
2 Likes
Why haven’t you switched to ST4 after such a long time though?
1 Like
Because DRR3 is THAT good, lol.
The singular focus on “transcending”, flying up high while looking from the bigger picture, has been priceless for many of the things I do.
The first two are also super good, i stayed long with them for good reasons.
I’m also not in a rush, the longer the changes can get planted & stick after, the better.
1 Like
have you tried ST4 though?
1 Like
Not yet. Maybe this is the time since i want to deal with some foundational works anyway?
But i wonder whether i need to bolster myself/would it be more straightforward if i use DRR1 again first or not.
Also if I can just stay with DRR3, I’d prefer to do that as much as possible.
1 Like
maybe give ST4 a try and see how it goes?
You can always go back
2 Likes
That… huh, i’ve been so fixated on running this stack undisturbed for a long time that I forgot I have the option to just… try…
ROFLMAO.
You’re right.
I’ll look at it again at the end of this cycle.
I really love the synergy my current stack has. I want the changes to stick as long as possible, so i want to use it as long as possible too.
It is THAT good.
But i can just try DRR4, and go back if i deem it not as fitting to/necessary as the current synergy after a cycle.
I also asked support for this, by the time my cycle is over, i’ll also have their perspective to form my opinion with.
2 Likes
lmao you are welcome
1 Like
one more question though, it is/was the case that healing took over the whole stack
what’s your opinion on it? has it been the case for you?
1 Like
I think it only happened once last cycle when i first tried the new 2 month experimental schedule.
Taking 5 day breaks from DRR3 & WB after every ~11 days fixed that, and makes the results more consistent on top of it. EE is still running in the break, i posted more in detail in the experiment’s thread.
Other than that, DRR3 has been boosting instead of overpowering the other subs.
The one that’s more prone to overpowering the others is actually WB. But that’s not as much of a concern anymore as it was before I added EE.
1 Like
thank you!
1 Like
I thought more about it.
I do need to work on my foundation after I found this out.
I had another “clicking” moment again, but I shared it in the black forum instead.
Creating & executing that stupid 67 cowboy spell actually helped me process this dilemma and made me gain more clarity on what to do, lol.
I understand what inner work I need to focus on. Everything is clear now.
I need the elements from DRR1&2. This is even more reason to finally move to the fourth stage.
Every stage taking 7 months… I’m starting to see a pattern here.
I might as well plan DRR4 to take at least 7 months.
Update 1:
EE 36s DRR4 15m WB 18s
Here we go.
I’ll start DRR4 from 2s next, +1s/listening day.
1 Like
are you doing 15m as a first loop because you have so much time with previous stages or is it generally your listening method for any sub? Start with 15min, then drop to very short loops and build up?
1 Like
Yes, this is just my listening method.
It could be risky, but I could run all the previous 3 stages for 15m with minimum recon. So there shouldn’t be a problem.
I’m expecting that the elements from stage 2 here might gonna give me some recon, but so far nothing yet. Hopefully it stays that way.
1 Like
No recon at all…
I didn’t expect it to be this smooth.
I jumped from DRR3 with no washout in between + full loop right out of the gate + fucked up sleep thanks to WB 
Well, I did use every stage for 7 months each. So this shouldn’t be surprising?
Maybe it’s safe to spike to 15m alongside EE every 8 listening days.
I’ll take the gamble.
1 Like
EE 37s DRR4 3s WB 18s
I accidentally listened to 3s instead of 2s.
Oh well, I’ll just start from 3s then.
Still no recon either from the last 15m run. I’ll go ahead with the “spiking” plan above.
–
I wrote this in another thread, I think it’s a good complement to the “wire cutter” metaphor I made about WB back then.
2 Likes
Here comes the DRR4’s healings.
I forgot whether this was from DRR1 or 2, but I remember having this type of healing running in the background when I used one of them.
I mixed DRR1 & 2 back then, but the extended break I took by using DRR3 for 7 months straight made me realize now what these two were doing back then. Yeah, it’s another “clarity from a break” moment.
Let’s see how accurate my assessment is later, after I’ve used more of DRR4.
It has been more than a year since I observed this theory I have: “A prolonged period of absence from a sub is one of the best ways to gain clarity about what it was doing, and subsequently, how this new understanding can help you better your approach when you get back to the sub.”
I’m the only sample size I have, so I can’t say anything conclusive.
But personally, the consistency of how it always pans out makes me believe this theory more and more.
2 Likes