I could, but this is assuming that the scripting “only shows up at 8s” instead of “starting at 8s”.
If my theory above is right, I’ll try this.
Maybe 8s is your current sweet spot at which you’ve got a bigger block to reconcile? And the solution would be to just stay at 8 sec for a few days
do you not get recon on double loops of DRR3?
I noticed one of the earlier reports of DRR3 30m you reported you felt lethargic.
Nope, it’s not as “invisible” as DRR1 & Mogul, but just a bit more, which isn’t much.
I did get significant recon from DRR3 for about a week when I first started it with microloops, but it was just the usual spike the first time you listen to a sub. Gone in no time.
I can’t recall feeling lethargic on 30m of DRR3.
These are from the earliest entries.
I’m sure it never dipped in the earlier phase (around 2-3 weeks ago) because I was very mindful about testing both 30m of DRR3 and WB.
Lethargy recon has been my biggest no-no since a long time ago. If I feel it from DRR3, I’d have turned down the exposure already.
Maybe you were reading about my entries from a few days ago?
I did mention lethargy, and I did plan to cut back down on DRR3’s exposure, but it turned out it was because of sleep deprivation. A good night of sleep + emergency LE fixed it.
1 Like
Intuitively it doesn’t seem to me like in one additional second you could say much that wasn’t already covered in the first 7 seconds. Even though I’ve suspected there could be a holographic or fractal aspect to the encoding being used, supposing it’s not, then dealing with such small increments it’s possible you’re not getting the whole of the next instruction/script piece and/or it’s being misinterpreted.
Rather than micromanaging the length of the microloop, would it not make more sense to scale up the size of the increment to at least fit another comparable bite sized piece of the script into what you’re hearing, and run with that until the recon vanishes? Think about it, every second is only 0.11% of the entire file, the file being 900 seconds long, maybe minimum 9 second increments (1%) would make more sense. Without knowing how the script is laid out, not overanalysing the recon and dealing with 1% or larger chunks would be how I would approach it. But I could be off target.
1 Like
How long are your washouts
WB has one of the longest scripts in the store.
Iirc Saint said about 60 pages.
That makes 4 pages per minute.
1 page in 15 seconds.
Half a page in 7.5 seconds.
So 1 second means a few lines of the script.
And we all know one sentence can hit us hard.
2 Likes
I think it is likely a lot more than 1 page of script per 15 seconds. You assume that the whole script is only repeated once per full loop. I guess it is repeated more than once. And this is only from one ‘narrator’ point. But there are probably several layered on top of each other at the very minimum.
But your point still stands @Parsifal.
I am very grateful for your accurate documentation of your micro-loop approach @Viktor. It’s eye and mind opening.
3 Likes
I’m glad you found them useful.
I’ve been in the process of scrubbing entries where I shared too much (well, i was that excited about the results), but you should still be able to find the broad ideas of how it went in the posts I left.
2 Likes
I saw this comment linked in @Jouissance 's journal
Think I agree, I’m seeing the changes stick around the 4 month mark for modules/titles and then taking a break from it/dropping it
Same, after running WB for nearly a year I can’t tell what I’d be like off it or what it’s changing anymore. It just feels like me at this point
Just dropped it now to see how it blooms, so curious what will happen there
1 Like
When did you start to get results with it? Did you run the name embedded?
Pretty quickly actually, in the first cycle. I didn’t understand recon back then so it would be results but followed by harsh recon
Store title first two months then customs since
2 Likes
Have you written a review of it so far?
No actually, I still feel like I have work to do on it before I feel ready to fully review it 
1 Like
lol ok no pressure
1 Like
I can confirm that 8s is clear now.
It took almost a month, but i was able to get it done finally.
Taking it this slow is the right move, if i could do it all over again, i’d stick with this spaced out slow increment.
I’m not sure if i’m ready for 10s yet.
Well, i know i am, but not without a bit more recon than i’m willing to deal with.
I have been getting consistent & better results using shorter playtime anyway.
There’s no incentive to push too much too quickly.
Update 1:
I think I understand why i got the feeling of “not connecting”.
Nowadays, instead of feeling that something is not connecting, it feels clear.
But I got new signals/intuitions that follow some of my actions, and I don’t know how to interpret it.
Should I continue with what I’m doing?
Should I stop? change?
It feels like I have my own internal mentor, and it has been an interesting streak of self discovery.
I learned to stop when one comes, then I learned to change when the other new signal shows up, but there is one that I’m still not sure about. So far, I think it tells me more about what’s happening than what to do.
There is still a lot to experiment with, but at least I’m standing on firm ground, rather than being lost in the cloud of “not connecting” as before.
3 Likes
About the kitchensinking
I think it makes a huge difference if you’re disciplined enough to tinker with these quantum loops of less then 10 seconds or not.
Looking at most WB question threads, people with no base run WB with short loops of 3-8 minutes.
And then they complain about recon and no results.
Given, you’re very sensitive to subs. I need to run subs mostly for at least a cycle to feel a change. Recon as well creeps up over time, without being obviously disturbing.
1 Like
I feel like it also depends on the subliminals chosen,making 2 customs 1 with Ascended mogul + Paragon and another with spartan and Lots at microloops shouldnt be a problem
1 Like
How do I explain the “click”…
It’s a part of WB’s “mysteriousness” that I thought would conflict with my cheerful nature, but it’s actually just a tool I can use to express my nature in a different way.
It’s still the same me, but expressed differently.
It doesn’t replace
it adds tools to my arsenal
it gives me more options
and it teaches me how to use them.
I feel like I’ve written this before, but the depth & variety of the understanding is different.
I might not gonna phrase this accurately, but it’s as if I’m given the opportunity to use another tool instead of sticking/clinging/staying with the one I’m using.
Rather than sticking to using scissors, I’m becoming more aware & adept at noticing how I can use a wire cutter instead.
They both cut, but a wire cutter is more appropriate for some situations than scissors.
The wire cutter doesn’t replace the scissors; it just adds more options that I can use.
I’m not replaced just because there is a wire cutter; it’s still me who controls the tools.
The experience of using WB is like discovering that I have a wire cutter in my toolbox all along, and having a wire cutting expert(lol) that guides me on how to use it.
Sometimes it feels weird to use a wire cutter, but once I get used to it, it becomes clear why it’s better to use it. I can still use the scissors if I want to, but the wire cutter does the job better.
5 Likes