Dior Sauvage? I think Dior makes it
you need some limitless for your brain
Sage Immortal : Buddha, Gandhi, Sadhguru, Dalai Lama
Renaissance Man + Ultimate Artist : Pablo Picasso, Mozart, Beethoven, Leonardo Da Vinci
LOL! I hate you so much. I just realized youâre talking about your new custom that you just made
But I was actually 200 IQ because thatâs where you got the name for it from
I remember someone saying that Chosen fits Tom Brady. Not sure if I entirely agree, but make of that what you will.
If you donât like a post, just ignore it or flag it without commentary.
Hmmm reading Chosenâs objectives again, I can âKINDâ of see that fitting? Granted I donât know too much about Tom Brady / or football in general.
Heâs definitely a good leader to win multiple super bowls on different teams as well.
I realize this has ended for now. For the future, please do not debate peopleâs character. Thatâs not the purpose of this forum.
Combining incredibly high status and confidence with great warmth and leadership, CHOSEN is the ascendant leader of all.
Gandhi
Chosen + Sage Immortal = Gandhi?
Seductress + Renaissance Man = Jenna Jameson
I addressed another post that should be flagged as âoff topicâ if all the other posts have been as well.
Chosen + Sage Immortal + Alchemist = Gandhi
Aegis Initiative: Bear Grylls
Elon Musk doesnât seem like the Stark type personally, I think he would fall under Limitless Executive if anything (like many billionaire CEOs, Bezos and Zuck being others). Just doesnât seem to have that gift of gab that you would expect from Stark.
David Goggins is definitely the Spartan and/or the Legacy, not sure if Sergio Ramos would fit there but thatâs a fun shout. Cristiano Ronaldo could also work as Spartan and/or the Legacy, if weâre going to stick to footy examples.
Ramos could just as easily be Chosen too, heâs probably the best captain in the sport in the last 20 years. Also he was responsible for ending the group dynamics (spaniards vs foreigners) that plagued Madridâs dressing room for a very long time and he did so in a gracious way. Complete opposites when it comes to his character off the field versus on the field.
Stark is the defacto âInnovatorâ archetype subliminal. Thatâs why I think it fits Elon Musk, Bezos, Zuckerberg. Itâs the obvious winner for the billionaire tech founder archetype.
Limitless Executive, Quantum Limitless, Beyond Limitless all align as great additions to the Stark core for innovation though.
I think the Boxing Mastery X to poor manâs Floyd Mayweather comparison by @MadaraUchiha was bad (but he wonât know since he has me on ignore). No one can match Floydâs excellence at defending, and thatâs not even mentioning his incredible ring IQ/generalship and his lightning jab.
I think a better comparison would be Joe Fraizer, a boxer who was never the strongest, biggest, fastest or smartest, but was able to ascend to the top of the sport with tenacity, a methodical approach to training camps and an intelligent mind in the ring.
For Muay Thai Mastery X, I canât mention names like Saenchai or Lerdsila for similar reasons. They are freaks, at a completely different level from anyone else. Instead I think about a guy like John Wayne Parr.
Have you ran Stark? Despite its namesake, I consider its emphasis on innovation is secondary to its focus on charisma and sociability.
Iâve ran Emperor + Stark for a total now of like 3 months?