What do you think about alternating titles?

[Sungaze]

@AnswerGroup I’m currently using KB1 (3rd cycle) + Sanguine (1st cycle)
I will do another 4th cycle of KB1 but I was also thinking of adding New Lovebomb.

However I usually prefer a stack of two titles, keep it lighter, faster results etc…

I was thinking of something like this starting from next cycle (listing cycles here):

• KB1 + LB
• KB 2 + Sanguine
• KB 2 + LB
• KB 2 + Sanguine
• KB 2 + LB
• KB 3 + Sanguine…

Do you think I would slow down too much the progress with LB and Sanguine?

[Lichtenauer]

Coincidence?
But I stopped believing in coincidences.

I was planning to ask a very similar question.

@Lichtenauer

I’m asking myself right now, if it would be wise, to switch between healing intense titles and other goal oriented titles from cycle to cycle.

That would give the healing titles the opportunity to bloom.

Like my next cycle with LB, than exchanging it for NR for one cycle, than coming back to LB.

That would give both titles the opportunity to bloom for one full cycle.

@Lichtenauer

And for the hopping, my intention was to get the most out of the blooming effect. When some users tell, that the effects show most intensively only after some longer washout period, I thought I could get a constant blooming of the healing title and the other title alternating.

So for me it would be

• KB2 + GM + LB
• KB2 + GM + NR
• KB2 + GM + LB
• KB2 or 3 + GM + NR
• KB3 + GM + LB
• KB3 + GM + NR

@SaintSovereign @Fire
What do you think of these experimental modalities?

[JAnon]

I had a similar idea recently, as I’m on Khan and Khan Black for the year, but feel I would benefit from both Sanguine and Love Bomb, but no money for a custom.

Was considering KB/K/LB for a cycle, then KB/K/Sanguine for a cycle, alternating.

Not sure though, for now keeping it to KB/K/LB.

[Sungaze]

Woah nobody ever tried this?

[Niles]

I do a similar approach to this with my cycles currently, two titles seems to drive faster results.

Example;

SB, Sanguine

SB, LE

SB, Sanguine.

It’s pretty similar to what’s laid out in the listening instructions on stack rotation except with two titles instead of 3.

To make sure I’m keeping up the results/objectives I’ll throw in some micro loops of my third title (1-3 minutes) just sporadically.

Working wonders so far, this has been my most effective cycle with SC.

[SaintSovereign]

We actually wrote a guide on this. It’s still experimental, but still seems to work well. For advanced users only.

EXPERIMENTAL: Zero Point Stack Rotation - Subliminal Club Support Hub

[Sungaze]

@SaintSovereign I was doing this table, correct me if I’m misunderstanding it

But than I read that is not suggested for multi stagers… so?
Better to just make it a 3 titles stack?

ps. I was planning to do another 4th cycle of KB1 and then go with KB2

[Sungaze]

That’s great! KB is a multi stager though, so it’s probably not suggested

[Lichtenauer]

As far as I see, you only have 5+6 days rest, so 11 instead of 12, besides that as long as you don’t change the stage it’s following the stack rotation guided, I’d say.

Since I have a 3 titles stack, im actually considering changing the third title only every two cycles, or I’d get titles much loss of exposure,

@SaintSovereign yeah, what we’re thinking about is basically stack rotation, but as I see it, we’re taking it one step further by exploiting the bloom effect. It’s kind of adding a fourth title through blooming.
So listening to threw subs actively and enjoying the bloom of a fourth one.

[Sungaze]

@Lichtenauer

As far as I see, you only have 5+6 days rest, so 11 instead of 12

mmm I think you are right! thanks

@Lichtenauer

besides that as long as you don’t change the stage it’s following the stack rotation guided, I’d say.

yes but as I said I was planning to do another 4th cycle of KB1 and then go with KB2