Understand this and use it while running subs.
5 Likes
I didn’t watch the video but based on the title and description, it seems like he’s covering the process part of manifesting.
Step 1: Set a target
Step 2: Process
If it’s too difficult to process, then work on building the capacity to process it.
It sounds simple, and it really is. The thing that I noticed overwhelmingly (like 99% of the time), is that people set the target, it ends up being too difficult to process, and then instead of building the capacity (because you’re not going to embody, change your internal reality, or shift your frequency without processing) - they double down on this idea of wanting outcomes without process. Sometimes they spiral into that, and what happens is the whole time they end up avoiding process or building the capacity to process. I think that if people become more intimate with “process” itself, as in what it entails, expects out of you, and requires - it will be easier to do things in general. When you understand it, it becomes predictable, and when it’s predictable, it’s much easier to navigate successfully.
This is what I learned after manifesting an ideal opportunity that I wanted. Took me 7 months, lol.
edit:
ChatGPT explanation
What you’re describing is essentially a two-layer model of change:
- Choose a target (what you want).
- Increase your ability to process what pursuing that target demands.
The part that stands out is your distinction between wanting the outcome and building the capacity to handle the process. Many people treat difficulty as evidence that the goal is wrong, impossible, or “not aligned,” when often it’s simply evidence that they’ve encountered a capacity limit.
In your framework:
- The target reveals the gap.
- The gap creates friction.
- The friction requires processing.
- If the processing load exceeds current capacity, capacity itself becomes the next target.
That’s a useful way to think about long-term goals because it turns setbacks into information rather than verdicts.
For example:
- Someone wants a better career.
- Applying, interviewing, networking, and handling rejection becomes emotionally overwhelming.
- The real work becomes developing resilience, communication skills, emotional regulation, consistency, or confidence.
- Once that capacity grows, the original goal becomes much more achievable.
A lot of people get stuck because they keep trying to force Step 1 harder:
“I want it more.”
“I’m visualizing harder.”
“I’m thinking positively.”
When the bottleneck is actually Step 2:
“Can I process the uncertainty, discomfort, boredom, rejection, learning curve, or delayed gratification that this goal requires?”
The other interesting point is your observation that process becomes easier when it’s predictable. That’s consistent with how humans generally handle stress. Uncertainty often feels worse than difficulty. Once you recognize that a cycle of challenge → resistance → adaptation is normal, you stop interpreting every obstacle as a sign that something has gone wrong.
Your seven-month example reflects that. The timeline itself isn’t surprising. Many meaningful changes happen less because someone found the perfect technique and more because they stayed engaged with the process long enough to become the kind of person who could sustain the outcome.
A concise version of your idea might be:
Every goal has a processing requirement.
If you can’t reach the goal yet, either continue processing at your current level or build the capacity to process more.
The outcome arrives as a consequence of becoming capable of handling what it requires.
That’s a more practical model than focusing exclusively on the outcome, because it gives you something actionable to work on every day regardless of how far away the result still is.
edit 2:
Might be a little cleaner, not sure.
ChatGPT explanation
This is a fairly strong framework because it shifts attention away from the outcome and toward the mechanism that produces the outcome.
What stands out is the distinction between:
- Setting the target (what you want)
- Processing (becoming capable of consistently engaging with what that target demands)
The core idea is that most people don’t actually fail at choosing goals. They fail at tolerating the experiences that pursuing those goals requires.
For example:
- Someone wants a successful business, but struggles to process uncertainty, rejection, and long periods without validation.
- Someone wants a healthy relationship, but struggles to process vulnerability, conflict, and emotional exposure.
- Someone wants confidence, but struggles to process embarrassment, mistakes, and judgment.
In each case, the target isn’t the real obstacle. The obstacle is the person’s current capacity to handle the process associated with that target.
I think one of the strongest lines in your passage is:
“If it’s too difficult to process, then work on building the capacity to process it.”
That reframes setbacks. Instead of concluding, “Maybe this goal isn’t for me,” the question becomes:
“What capacity am I missing that would allow me to handle this process?”
That creates a practical feedback loop.
You could even expand the model slightly:
Step 1: Set a target
Step 2: Attempt the process
Step 3: Identify where capacity breaks down
Step 4: Build capacity
Step 5: Return to the process
Then repeat.
The other interesting point is your observation that people often try to bypass process altogether. They continue focusing on outcomes, visualization, motivation, or future results while avoiding the discomfort required to become the person capable of achieving those results. Whether someone calls it manifestation, personal growth, skill development, or habit formation, that pattern shows up everywhere.
The underlying principle could be summarized as:
The distance between where you are and where you want to be is usually measured in processing capacity. If you cannot yet process what the goal requires, build the capacity first. The outcome follows from the capacity, not the other way around.
That’s a concise way of expressing the idea behind the entire passage.
I’ll also give a practical example related to wealth:
Let’s say someone’s target is their dream 6 figure job or business selling hand-made sculptures. It could be anything.
Part 1: What they typically do is visualize, feel like it’s already true, assume that it’s already their reality, “trust the universe”, focus on feeling good, etc.
Part 2: When that person does those things, there is internal resistance that occurs because the nervous system recognizes it as unfamiliar and therefore unsafe, or their identity isn’t aligned with it, or they have deep-seated limiting beliefs that aren’t aligned with it, etc. There are all of these things in the internal framework that are not aligned with their target. All of that has to be processed.
Example: You grew up in a religious home where you were conditioned that “money is evil”. That conditioning is going to clash with your visualizations, assumptions, feeling, etc. It’s like giving off 2 different signals. One signal you’re giving off is your set target, and the other signal you’re giving off is “money is evil, I don’t want this, and this is unsafe for me because I’ll go to hell”. So your internal framework isn’t fully aligned, your embodiment is compromised, and the signal of your frequency is unclear.
Those limiting beliefs and fears of “money being evil” need to be healed otherwise you’re subconsciously pushing away what you want. That healing occurs during processing. And that might just be one thing that needs to be processed.
The requirement is that you need the capacity/foundation/stability - whatever you want to call it - to hold space for all of the processing related to your set target. And if you don’t have that, it’s never a worry because you can just build it.
ChatGPT explanation (I just glossed it over, seemed good enough lol)
What you’re describing is a fundamentally different model from the popular “just think positive and trust the universe” approach.
In your framework, the manifestation process is not:
- Set target
- Visualize
- Receive
It’s closer to:
- Set target
- Expose misalignment
- Process misalignment
- Expand capacity
- Embody target
- Receive
The key distinction is that the target itself becomes a diagnostic tool.
If someone sets a target of earning six figures through a sculpture business, the target immediately illuminates everything in their system that is incompatible with that reality:
- Fear of visibility
- Fear of rejection
- Fear of success
- Beliefs about money
- Beliefs about deservingness
- Family conditioning
- Nervous system dysregulation
- Identity conflicts
- Scarcity patterns
The visualization isn’t creating the reality directly. It’s revealing the friction between current reality and desired reality.
In that sense, resistance isn’t evidence that manifestation isn’t working. Resistance is the manifestation process.
A useful analogy is strength training.
Imagine someone wants to deadlift 500 pounds.
The conventional manifestation approach often says:
Feel as though you can already deadlift 500 pounds.
Your model would say:
Attempting to hold the reality of a 500-pound deadlift reveals exactly where your current capacity ends. Then build capacity.
If your back is weak, strengthen it.
If your grip fails, strengthen it.
If your technique breaks down, improve it.
The goal isn’t to pretend you’re already capable. The goal is to become capable.
The same applies psychologically.
Suppose someone’s target triggers:
- Anxiety
- Shame
- Guilt
- Panic
- Self-sabotage
Those aren’t obstacles to the process.
They are the process.
The target is simply exposing where capacity has not yet been built.
This is why your final point is important:
If you don’t currently have the capacity to process what’s coming up, then build the capacity.
That removes the sense of failure.
Instead of:
“I have resistance, therefore I’m doing something wrong.”
It becomes:
“I have resistance, therefore I’ve discovered the next thing to work on.”
The practical implication is that almost any ambitious target can be reduced to two questions:
- What is the target?
- What arises in me when I genuinely attempt to move toward or embody that target?
The answers to question #2 become the roadmap.
Someone who wants a successful sculpture business might discover:
- Fear of charging money
- Fear of being judged online
- Fear of disappointing family
- Fear of becoming responsible for success
Those reactions aren’t random. They’re the exact material that must be processed if the person’s internal framework is going to become congruent with the target.
Viewed this way, manifestation is less about attracting and more about integration. The target remains fixed, and the work becomes expanding your capacity to hold the thoughts, emotions, responsibilities, risks, and identity associated with that target until there is no longer significant internal conflict around it.
4 Likes