Your theory of “hacking” is fairly harmonious with the ways that subliminals are used here. Here it’s sometimes referred to as ‘Applying Conscious Guidance and Action-taking to enhance subconscious response to the subliminals and improve results’. It’s a good theory and, more importantly, it works.
But the issue here is not the theoretical aspect. It’s the technical aspect.
Putting this straightforwardly:
For the average adult human, 7-9 hours of sleep time is a reasonable amount after 15 to 17 hours of waking activity.
The above is not a theoretical point. It’s a technical point based on the biological parameters and requirements of human bodily functioning.
Similarly,
~36 to 48 hours of rest and processing time is a reasonable amount after 15 to 30 minutes of ZP-grade subliminal exposure.
The above is also not a theoretical point. It’s a technical guideline for how to manage subliminal exposure based on biological parameters of brain and mental functioning.
In the first example of sleeping, if you skip over the 7-9 hours of sleep and try to replace sleep with alternatives such as caffeine ingestion or even meditation, you’re likely to, very soon, experience symptoms of sleep deprivation that will impair your ability to function optimally in daily life.
In the same way, if you forego the recommended rest and processing times between subliminal sessions, you are likely to experience symptoms of over-exposure that will decrease the effectiveness of how your mind integrates and expresses the useful subliminal material in your programs.
In short: rest and processing times are a vital element of the listening approach. And there are specific quantity windows that are recommended or required for both subliminal exposure times and rest and processing times.
When it comes to the technical guidelines for listening, there is some room for individual experimentation within those guidelines. But your proposed plan seems like it might be disregarding the guidelines significantly.
That’s why people have asked about your past experiences and track record of results. They are probably trying to assess whether you have a realistic baseline for expecting optimal results from your current experiment.
What say you?