Season 2: NFTW (which one are you?) [11.11.23]

Zero Point Union. And then, we rest with upgrades and focus on new products and the such.

28 Likes

New sub season confirmed? :eyes:

4 Likes

That looks like a logo of an old school GTA game!!:clap:

8 Likes

Sexy branding.

1 Like

Hey, as an immediate buyer of this title when it comes out, i’d love to see these touched on please:

  • Studio recording (mic placement, technique and choice)

  • Building trust, familiarity and rapport with artists you’re producing for and understanding their vision for the song amazingly.

  • Overcoming issues with being a ā€˜bedroom artist’. Such as making the most out of the equipment you have (lack of or low quality for instance) and poor recording spaces.

  • With all the fancy equipment, plugins available, this can blind us to what really matters for a great track which is performance and your ear. On the mixing side, EQ and volume balance.

*Some kind of way to make sure you are looking after your hearing for longevity reasons as a producer. The ability to take regular breaks even when you are on a role and in flow, and then comeback and immediately get back in that place again, like pressing a pause button.

  • No more half finished tracks, develop the ability to finish tracks through discipline.

  • Rapidly learn how to write complex harmony parts.

  • Whilst listening to any song, intuitively analyse and understand what makes the song great and learn new things to improve your own music.

  • Fully trust your own authentic musical intuition rather than falling to how ā€˜music theory’ say you must do everything - I’ve had the problem of learning all this music theory and forgetting that your intuition is what matters most and music theory is a palette for expressing what you hear in your head.

  • Building an impressive portfolio of work and having that sixth sense for sniffing out and working with for artists that have high potential for becoming a name later on in their career.

  • Absorb sounds from around you, store them in your memory to recreate or use as inspiration later.

  • Automatically pick out lyrical ideas from conversations you have or overhear and the same with the rhythm of what people are saying and use it to spark ideas for a new melody.

  • Overcome perfection when writing, producing and finishing music.

I have absolute faith that this will be far beyond expectations :sunglasses:

4 Likes

What is this magical sounding name ?:star_struck:

1 Like

Also question so i have a qtks with minds eye now obviously it Wont be updated as new mindseye release.

But if i listen to mindseye after it or before it how would that work .

Need new ascension chamber as well to update my qtks. And We see how high the discount is.

Otherwise i just supplement with new minds eye

Sorry for the generic answer but Genesis would have the most ā€œrisk and adventureā€ scripting which fits the bill for extreme sports nicely!

1 Like

That would just make people even more curious I’m sure. :eyes:

1 Like

Isn’t Dispenza a newage author?

No. He actually uses instruments to measure various body phenomena before, while and after performing meditation.

Also loads of people are encouraged to get medical reports before and after they do the meditations.

They do seem to show marked changes.

EDIT: and by marked changes, I don’t mean simply changes to just the brain that you can observe due to normal meditation but things like heart aura changes and observation of a person’s electromagnetic field aside from astounding physical healing.

5 Likes

I’m looking online but can’t find much apart that he was a master of ā€œRamatha school of enlightenment evoking a 35000 old Lemurian warriorā€¦ā€ , he’s not a doctor etc…:thinking:

1 Like

I would recommend his books like:

  • Breaking the Habit of being Yourself.
  • You are the Placebo
  • Becoming Supernatural

The online space is always critical of things like meditation and subliminals so I don’t take them too seriously.

His youtube testimonial channel is very good too.

2 Likes

Sure, but I try to do the same to contemporary authors that sprout like mushrooms and claim they have secrets (most of the time just rebranded old, simple things) for supernatural powers, healing serious illness etc :sweat_smile:

I’ll take a look into him and see how it feels

1 Like

Also I don’t find this to be true… meditation is recognized from most people as very very benefical for wellbeing, it’s just a metter of being grounded and how one stretch out claiming superpowers

There are loads of people still critical about meditation and thinks it’s the gateway to demons and such.

Anyways, look for yourself. No one can convince you but yourself.

8 Likes

Yes, it’s unfortunate that there is still such little understanding about meditation. But it takes courage to come into your own power and consider ā€œeverything.ā€ To fully live, we must examine things.

2 Likes

People use meditation techniques for a lot of things from emotional and mental wellbeing, all the way to business purposes (I’m into meditation since I was 20)… then of course there are groups of fearful people that follow religion like a cult that think what you just said, but I’d see it’s a very small group
Of course I might be wrong and only see the cup half full :rofl:

Yes, as I said before I’ll take a look and see

3 Likes

Most scientists would categorically disagree with the ā€œWhat the bleep do we knowā€ material(which Dispenza produced). There is value in it because it has helped people, even around here(I believe Lion uses Dispenza’s meditations), so there’s that. Nowadays, if you want to convince somebody that a certain fringe practice(from the perspective of the modern Western establishment) is actually doing something(which means that it needs to change something measureable with devices according to Westerners) and not mere superstition, you need some sort of materialistic/scientific backing. It has been like this since the Age of so-called Enlightenment. If Subclub wants to avoid damage to their reputation, they need to appear as scientific as they can, because science is the sole authority of our times, the dominant religion.
That being said, I personally consider him to be part of the crowd that sort of began with Jung and Capra. The whole ā€œspiritual practices need scientific backing to be credibleā€ crowd or ā€œlet’s demystify practices with scienceā€. When you study how scientists rebelled against empty claims made by the Catholic church, you can see where they originally came from, and that was for a good cause back then. But it has went way too far, and unfortunately, there is always a hidden materialism behind most of this stuff(notice what things are measured, and how).
Dispenza’s work is useful for people who are still on the fence, meaning that they are skeptical of spiritual practices and need some sort of proof(read: proof that is accepted among materialists) before they engage with it. However, the attempted merging of mysticism with science is something that is very common among New Age groups and to my knowledge, it has never led to much(Most scientists I’ve talked to absolutely hate the idea of science getting co-opted by spiritual groups, and spiritual practitioners who don’t have an inferiority complex instilled by colonial doctrines don’t need to validate their practices in the eyes of Western European science). It just gives people the comfort of feeling like they are not part of a cult. When a group of Tibetan lamas get dragged to the US to be studied for changes in neuroplasticity, people go ā€œooooh so it does something, after allā€, even though it doesn’t tell them anything about the actual content of what the Lamas experience, which is what actually counts in their own tradition. Truly understanding the nature of impermanence, for example, can never be measured by some device. And you can also not reduce attributeless consciousness to a mathematical formula(there goes the dream of real AI), because mathematics only deals in descriptions of relationships that occur within the observer. In the end, I very much agree with a saying that goes like this: ā€œFor those who believe in God no proof of His existence is necessary; for those who do not believe in God no proof is possibleā€. It is a futile quest, but along the way, it can help some people get into practices that’ll prove to be beneficial for them. If you want science, talk to Scientists, but if you want things that science cannot possibly cover, you need to talk to people who are not even interested in validating themselves in the terms set by science, but rather try their best to be deeply congruent with their own tradition.

10 Likes

That’s what I meant with my first point, I’ve read books that I think are similar (I might be wrong of course, and I’ll give it a try).
I’ve always been into ā€œtradional teachingā€ and when I read people like Greg Braden (that btw I think are generaly in good faith) I see a mess of different teaching, rebranded, mixed and hyped to get audience. I guess spirituallity would be a bit boring for the masses? :sweat_smile: