I’m using 1 loop of a program rather than 2 loops. I’m also using Q rather than T^2. So T^2 is about 4 loops of Q.
So I’m now more productive. Few headaches. Less overwhelm. Easier to focus. It’s as though my brain can now think about and do other things.
I might have said that. Remember @anon78457040 is 
when it comes to subs. If I did that many loops, I think I would turn into a 
or 
Thanks for confirming!
I’m glad to see things are going well for you, and that you’re recieving more productivity and all the sorts. I’m seeing that more on the higher loops even though I’m sleepy af.
Of course, everyone’s different. I think I can do the higher loops now, I prefer it and I feel better on it.
on!
I feel like bragging about how many loops I was listening to at one point. However, I’ve now had to go back to fewer. I’m still seeing results! It’s so weird in a good way!
Come on, I want to know how many now aha.
I’m only playing more loops to see my sweet spot, not because I want to just play higher loops for the fun of it tho.
I get that.
My new thought I tell myself about subliminals is:
Of course but Saint was doing 6 loops to find his sweet spot for the current program he’s running:
And also he said:
Whilst I noticed a chillness on one loop, I’m getting better results on higher loops. When I add things to my stack I need to start them out on 1-2 loops and then increase gradually.
I don’t have any recon at the moment from what I feel. I do feel different though, I can’t explain how. I feel like Dragon Reborn has the Pragya module in it to make things more accurate and access the subliminal faster.
This is quite possible.
I spoke to @Brandon about that misconception. Less is more is not about the number of loops but about the density of your stack. Even in the quote you posted there’s a hint about that:
This makes sense, and it’s a shame for me since it means having to drop stuff for density but it’s just the way it works out.
I answered that concern in your thread:
It’s possible I took the quote out of context, or interpreted it in such a way that leans to what I am already doing.
No worries, you’re experimenting and it’s great you share it with us. Where could we learn more about your experimentation?
Think its still hard to base what to pick based on density although its a good guideline to start with cause different programs are dense to different people.like i have trouble running ascended mogul cause massive reconcilation for me and it doesnt gel with me very well although its a small script but spartan works great but my friend finds it the opposite.am is really easy and works great for him but spartan is dense/gives him opposite effects even at 1 loop.saints experience with blue skies was a good example
It’s a very good point, I forgot about that post. @Brandon, we have a new old hint on the density in here.
Although in my discussion with Brandon we were more focused on stacking high-density programs. But again, like the post says, it’s more about your goals and issues you want to resolve.
Yeah I read, he posted it in my journal. It gave me something new to think about, but also he posted about StarkU having the full script too which was confirmed by Saint.
Hmm,think that post more goes into density of processing vs speed of results.if the program is aligned well with you,it wont feel that heavy and reconcilation will be less.
On the other hand,running a dense stack with multiple dense programs with multiple objectives will slow down how fast the programs manifest into your reality even without noticable reconcilation based on this part of the post
A very dense stack will take longer to manifest due to the sheer amount of manifestation required.
I’ve sometimes wondered if density is also relative to what’s in the person’s subconscious. If the script is aligned with one’s belief system, perhaps it will be experienced as less dense.
Yep,thats pretty much what i think too.however also think that a person can only manifest so much at one time so the more you run the slower they will manifest
Right now, the summary is that T^2 worked great for 2 to 4 months. Now I’m listening to 1 loop of Q formats. Beyond that, DR is working out well and exceeding my expectations.