I’ve read a lot of books on my journey of trying to unf*ck my mind.
That one really helped me understand myself a lot better.
2 Likes
I remember one of the first subliminals i listened to,it was on youtube and i listened to it years back so i cant remember the creator but it was some random girl,but it gave me insane pyhsical shifting results litterally after listening to it for a couple of hours or maybe even 30 min (cant remember it was a while ago) my mum even commented that i looked different and better like an hour after listening to it,so results with no action is defintly possible,having pyhsical shifting results on the same day in a few hours is also very possible.
I think what possibly led to the dramatic results was possibly because it was the first ever subliminal i listened to.
1 Like
Then after listening to youtube subliminals for a while i didnt have the same success again, apart from listening to a nose subliminal overnight,then i came across sublimimal club wich finally started giving me results again
1 Like
That’s really cool. If anyone can replicate that and do it better on a consistent level, it is here at SC.
Hope it happens.
1 Like
i do not have enough posts to achieve high alchemist - how do i apply for these roles?
Here is an overview of the roles
How to apply:
Write posts continually
- Start a journal. One post every day makes 365 posts in a single year. 3.5 years and youre Arch Alchemist just keeping a journal.
- Contribute in other threads. Ask questions, state your opinion, share experiences
- Don’t Spam
- Once you’ve reached enough posts for an upgrade, open a ticket with support, tell them your forum name, post count and store email address, and they’ll set you up with rank and discount.
2 Likes
we already have the artisanal line …so you are planning to have something even more hardcore ？what will those be like ？ 
I think that this should be like an exclusive black card member club that tests new products and provide feedback.
You could do a lot more experimentation that you are more cautious about and get feedback from the pro users.
This way you could get a lot more data and you can trust that data since the people in the club have proven they are reliable.
I also would have a stipulation that any nonsense will get you kicked out of the pro club and be much more rigid than the public form. This also would increase the reliability of your data.
I am thinking like a permanent ZP testing group that you created before ZP came out.
This is much like @Hoppa elite club thinking.
7 Likes
I have read this book here when I was a teenager lmao… 
…but most of the advice in there is not applicable for most people. The book is more a basic collection of abstract concepts and general case studies.
1 Like
If the copy of future subs is structured like the new Mind’s Eye’s an interesting option could be to opt out of certain Main Features. Not sure if this could always be implemented as easy as for ASBR without fame, but it would be a great way to streamline customs.
3 Likes
I’m not a regular poster on this forum, or any forum for that matter, it’s not who I am.
The discounts for those that post often are fair, as they are actively assisting in the progression of the subs we use here.
However, in this instance, in my opinion, it would be rather unfair to gate keep people like myself (and I’m sure it’s more than just me) loyal customers, who have been around since the set and forget days, who read the forum regularly and actually pay attention and follow what you and fire recommend.
I think a subliminal club knowledge quiz would be a decent way to test people, if you’re looking for people that are competent. Possibly checking support tickets for past behaviours…but that might be more work you don’t need.
This is all ifs and maybes right now I know, and you both usually come up with something that’s fair for everyone, just thought I’d add my piece to it.
17 Likes
Well, I think this is part of the point. People who have actively posted their experiences on here are assisting in the development of SC products. So this can be seen partly as a reward for those that are actively contributing to SubClub. Also, by giving them access to more advanced or experimental products, they know they’ll get useful feedback, and they can monitor the effects of those titles via journals. What’s the point in giving an experimental product to someone who doesn’t journal?
I do get your concern, but I also think some amount of effort to contribute should be required by members to get access to more advanced titles, otherwise these titles will also need to be nerfed to suit the general public.
8 Likes
Well, I respectfully disagree, and will leave it at that.
2 Likes
Especially once name embedded Majors are a thing, and each major title will have to be individually compiled, this would be an interesting feature to add.
Simply choose the features you want from a major title and get it streamlined to your needs.
You want a name embedded Minds Eye without Raikov and Mind palace? Just remove the checks 
and you have your own special edition with less content to process.
4 Likes
This is indeed a fair point. It’s what the Quintessence Pro Platform is for: those who want to experiment and report back.
But, we also don’t want to “gatekeep” too much, hence why we’re outsourcing ideas to the customers. So, let’s not get too caught up on the eligibility part, since as @tintin mentioned, it’s going to be fair. Let’s focus more on what you want to see on the platform a bit. Then we’ll look at eligibility, since what’s going on Q-Pro will be linked to it’s actual capabilities.
7 Likes
I think this should be considered.
While post count can be an important metric, there are people who have posted very insightful and introspect posts, demonstrating social awareness, self-awareness, and maturity. It’s more and quantity, and more than quality; it’s a matter of what that quality consists of.
I think there is a difference between gatekeeping, contrasted with wanting to make sure only responsible individuals get advanced, complicated, or experimental products.
2 Likes
I’m not sure what options you had in mind.
I will need to meditate on this.
2 Likes
One idea on how to change the metric:
Post count alone does not say much since as many have said, a lot of posts are simply fun comments and small talk.
However, most fun and small talk comments are rather short.
So make only posts count that are longer than a certain amount of words.
Make only lengthier posts count.
That way you automatically filter out most of the fun and small talk comments.
And then, for those posts that do count because they are lenghty enough, run the “likes per post” metric as an indicator of quality content.
A simple way to 1. filter out the noice posts and then 2. see what quality the non-noice posts by someone actually have.
3 Likes
Quizes don’t work in the Age of ChatGPT anymore though…
But I agree, that customer purchase loyalty should be a factor also to be co-considered in the evaluation process somehow.
Maybe something like:
Amount of Titles Purchased * Post Count * Days Visited the Forum * Likes Received = Metric Number
4 Likes
@tintin and @bujin are highlighting two separate yet legitimate considerations.
User Competence - which would be more like earning a license to drive automobiles (or a special license to drive even experimental automobiles).
User Contributions - this one is more similar to paying taxes or fees to maintain the quality of the roads for ALL automobiles.
One does not cancel the other. More a question of which one (or ones) are prioritized in a given situation.
6 Likes