Halfway done with this cycle of Wanted Black, BDLM, and GLMTC.
I get invited to a lot of parties.
This will definitely land you a hottie.
If people talk about you a lot, you will get obsessions from others.
15 Likes
No, it hasnât. You guys just make this nonsense up based on your own biases and then spread misinformation.
We can make âunisexâ scripting and still base the title on what society calls âtraditional masculinity.â
Unisex scripting is as easy as changing the word âwomenâ in a seduction script to âthe beautiful people youâre attracted to,â for example. And this isnât how we do it, ours is even better. Our scripting in either case is still very much masculine.
Stark wasnât made for aggression. It was made for being an alpha innovator and entrepreneur. That was its main purpose, and being that individual requires a slightly softer touch than the beat someone over the head dominance of Emperor. Try going to venture capitalists with an entitled âgive me this money because I am dominant attitude,â and see if theyâll choose you over the 50000 other people wanting that money.
If you want to add more dominance to Stark, stack it with something. Just stop repeating the myth that anything that is âunisexâ is inherently weaker. We have the data, we have the mastery of language, and we have no reason to lie, because we have so many choices and options available.
46 Likes
Interesting that Emperor makes me soft, not agressive / dominant. This âsoftnessâ has a very pronounced power behind it.
Stark makes feel like âI have some clever ideas but Iâm not sure if I have right to present it to the worldâ.
Emperor, quite opposite: âI will show you something, and you can decide do you want it or not. But I WILL show it to youâ.
Anyway, its quite hard for me to translate into words but I still think that Stark can be dramatically upgraded.
Btw, Genesis has the ârightâ vibe. Is it aggressive / dominant? I think not.
Stark plays the long term and seduces. Emperor is short get the thing done in the moment by dominance. On stark you show passiveness in order to change the personâs perception of you as a good person/leader. Then they get seduced by your magnestism.
2 Likes
Yes, I know you have said that Stark contains masculinity scripting before (which I donât doubt), but it doesnât hit even as close to AM.
I get the vision but we are not necessarily asking for over the head dominance of Emperor, just to a suitable level, for example - if someone goes with internal power and dominance of Emperor but with social skills of Stark (almost like HOM), of course VC will choose you.
I think most of us are talking about the masculinity part because of the lack of centeredness and power like Emperor, imagine GLM:TC with intelligence of Stark (just for example)
Also the ambition and drive on that could be sent to great limits, making it Stark BLACK
3 Likes
This title is no joke dude. I ate 3 peoples worth of carribean food and still super hungry.lol
I need to go back to 30s instead of 3min.
3 Likes
Then stack both titles as suggested. Many of us donât need any masculinity boost on Stark. Iâve run it for 9 months in total and I didnât see any need to get that boost. I even personally think that that boost could ruin social effect of Stark as you could be perceived as too dominant and intense.
Today I ran two full loops of DR:LD within six hours and Iâm great! 
So far⌠lol
6 Likes
I wish, but there is a stack limit of 3 titles
The priorities.
Building a custom could be the way to go.
1 Like
I wanted to keep 2 pure wealth titles in the stack and an alpha one on top that, so yeah that sums up the problem
If I was going that way, I wouldnât say this in first place
1 Like
Well, so Stark Black with masculinity boost will be a dream sub.
Original Stark for people who doesnât need masculinity boost and Black version forâŚ.
STARK BLACK: AGGRESSIVE INNOVATOR 
Creative and powerful as Wanted Black in seduction but in social and wealth areas!
Woot? I donât know, maybe im just projecting but never this way with other titles but then again this has a bunch of objectives that the ones ive run before didnât have and is maxed out
Can you guys take your stark talk to the stark thread lol?
And by the way just use GLM with Stark or AscensionâŚ. You will get that âmore masculinityâ you desire
5 Likes
Stark doesnât need a âmasculinity boost.â Itâs masculine in its own way. Youâre trying to define âmasculinityâ as âaggression.â Youâre leaving out vision, drive, problem solving, leadership, etc. All of which are positive elements of masculinity.
If you want to run something more aggressive, use stack rotation to include it. But weâre not remaking Stark with more aggression and slapping âBlackâ on it. They would lead to an issue where the Black series just becomes more featured filled versions of major titles.
33 Likes
Okey 
1 Like
People are clueless, want more and more âŚuse the current masculine /alpha products for a year minimum then come back to Mr Saint and moan and groan âŚusers have no true appreciation and have no patience lol
5 Likes
âSince when soft is not masculine?â
Bruce âbe-waterâ Lee
2 Likes
You just assumed that I have âno true appreciationâ and âno patienceâ⌠is that correct?
I mean, I get what they are asking for, and they are asking for will turn Stark into a kitchen sink sub, which is exactly what we want to avoid. I had this concern with WB while making it, that maybe I was adding too much. I had to go in and rewrite a lot of it to make sure it stays focused.
Making Stark âaggressiveâ would break the balance, especially since it IS aggressive, in a more diplomatic and political manner. And dare I say it, a lot of this is either recon or in the userâs head. A long time ago, someone said Stark was âweak because unisexâ and that ridiculous label kept being parroted around due to peopleâs disdain for political correctness.
8 Likes