I just got it today but @SaintSovereign is this the custom based on the modules I sent you by PM, just want to make sure to be safe?
It feels different…Can’t pin point it yet. No new manifestations to talk about yet either.
I just got it today but @SaintSovereign is this the custom based on the modules I sent you by PM, just want to make sure to be safe?
It feels different…Can’t pin point it yet. No new manifestations to talk about yet either.
Yes it is.
I ran it through Q at like 9:00pm last night or something like that, maybe later. What manifestations were you expecting?
Nothing bad. More so thinking things so not sure anything yet as I’m excited to see what results will come with this.
NOTE: We are currently testing new backend support software. You may tag @qOS directly with questions. Please do not “prompt” qOS – what this does is actually place your questions within an inbox within our support suite that only @Fire and myself can access, ensuring that your forum questions are not lost. The qOS account may answer, or one of us will answer.
Again, this is not for AI-style prompting and follow up questions, those are for the Support Portal. This is to ensure that the standard qOS questions are not lost. See it in action here:
Now this is a dream come true.
Amazing.
Although I fear you may have opened pandoras box…
lol – It’s under control. qOS does not answer automatically. @Fire and I are personally running it. If it gets out of hand, we’ll scale it back, direct longer or repeated questions to support.
We will tag it in the forum? @qOS
Oh, now i see. So we go in each title main thread and ask there something related.
Tag qOS on the forum.i think the best place to do so is in your journal if you have one. Else the main thread of the title, module pack, etc that’s related to the question.
Is there any chance that qOS questions and replies can be limited to a dedicated thread, subforum, or even DM?
Do you have any recommendations on when to use qOS vs. when to open a support ticket?
3 instances I can think of when support answers are more useful:
I think qOS is useful for quick answers to questions related to combining titles and modules. And for a more detailed explanation of them individually or together.
Thanks @Lion, I appreciate the breakdown and am also assuming you have pretty good insight here since you’re a forum ambassador.
Particularly this last point.
I think qOS is useful for quick answers to questions related to combining titles and modules. And for a more detailed explanation of them individually or together.
qOS may be a fantastic replacement for the beta stack explorer feature in this regard.
EDIT: and I’d like to reiterate that it would be nice to see a dedicated qOS part of the forum if possible, especially based on what you’ve said. Obviously just my opinion, but I’d rather the product discussion threads return to a focus on sharing results and experiences on the subs than asking about stacks and theory.
It is far too early for anyone to make any determination over where and how the qOS account should post. The pilot just launched yesterday, and I only answered five questions as of yet.
If an issue arises, we will deal with it. I want to remind everyone that this is not a bot. It is an inbox. @Fire and myself are physically logged into this account from our support software. We are choosing what questions to answer – whether using qOS or not in the response – and whether to redirect an inquiry to support.
Experiences and results are important, yes – but with ZPU, understanding how a stack operates is just as equally important. They contain a lot of good information regarding how a title operates and how it operates with other titles.
We are keeping a close eye on things.
Use qOS in the same manner it was being used before. Simple questions, stack questions, custom evaluations. Long, multi-faceted questions will be redirected to support.
Maybe make qOS a PM only thing after full automation.
The art of war would would stack well with Hero Origins i believe. What would be the result would it enhance my skills ?
Yeah, loving this
There’s a few interesting questions being asked that might not have been shared on forum unless someone shared what they got from support
We will not be doing that. There is not even a problem right now. We have barely answered any questions, and we’ve been using qOS publicly for months now. Nothing has changed except I put it on its own account linked to a shared inbox so @Fire and myself can track requests and questions, since we have received complaints that their questions were missed on the forum. That is all.
It hasn’t even been 24 hours yet, so I see no reason to adjust anything until I have more information on how this system is even being used.