Disturbed?
I think that both have scripting that ultimately accomplishes this goal in different ways.
This is literally what Stark is made for ^
Stark is about fame, or the way that I think about it, very magnetic leadership that causes adoration. In the business sense translates to being a Unicorn.
Personality wise, it’s being high-energy, larger than life, a visionary, an innovator, someone who will be truly famous/have a unicorn business. That’s how I read it. Someone who you want to get in on the journey with EARLY because they’re about to blow up. I’d definitely invest with that person! So the “investing” scripting is there.
Mogul, from my understanding, is a calmer vibe. It’s probably wrong to say Mogul is a mini-HOM, and I’m excited to learn the difference between Mogul and HOM, apart from no Emperor scripting, but for now Mini-HOM is a decent metaphor… Mini-HOM would also excite people to invest with you, but with more certainty, so to speak. Stark is the guy who will probably give you 1000x return on your money, but Mogul is the guy who will certainly give you 2-3x. Both are amazing to invest with. Which one is better? Depends on your personal preference as an investor. Combining both is the best of both worlds.
This is the mogul objectives ^
I think that “wealth” and “reliability” wouldn’t be the best way to describe the Stark vibe. Instead of Wealth, Success, and Reliability, I’d call the Stark vibe Magnetic Leader, Successful, and Innovator.
TBH even Elon Musk has both traits. Everyone perceived him as Stark-Like when he was building Tesla and Rockets to the freaking moon at the same time, and basically everyone thought he was crazy, but probably crazy enough to actually pull it off - so he got investors.
But now he’s pulling off Neuralink and he’s not even considered crazy anymore, people know he’s actually going to do it, so he’s more certainty now just from experience and track record. He’s more Mogul like. He’s not just an innovator anymore, he’s also an expert. He has both vibes.