That does not seem right to me.
you left your definition of ‘experience’ vague, so this may be more of a Rorschach test than anything else. But what I imagined you were asking was: ‘How can I have the same familiarity, confidence, and knowledge of a particular subject, skill, or domain that a person with significant experience would have—but without having to live through and accumulate that actual experience myself?’
Maybe I did not catch your actual intended meaning.
I think from my own perspective I’d be more likely to ask: 'How can I leverage and scaffold the experience that I actually already do have, such that I can make unexpected or lateral moves into areas where I seem to have no obvious experience.
To me, that’s a combination of (Quantum) Limitless, Raikov, and Submodel Alpha.
Not replacing experience, but getting much more value out of the experience that you do have, and seeing how to quickly get strategic value out of any additional experiences. To a naive observer that might look like getting experience effortlessly. From an internal perspective, I think it would feel like ‘working and learning smarter’.