Not directly talking to you @Azriel, just wanted to add my perspective- I know this is a very old reply/thread but if someone is searching for this, it might be handy to know that with HoM, the strategizing and shrewdness is done on an unconsciously guided level.
In example negotiations, with the Stark vs HoM archetype.
With HoM negotiations flow like water, you flow around obstacles in order to get things moving. The last time I had a negotiation, I quickly realized that the person across from me did not really like that āhardā negotiation, instead, I heard all the concerns and occasionally pushed against them with some very polite arguments, in order to get more information. Then after the negotiations were finished I had a-ha moments on how to move things even further, so the obstacles/objections would no longer be there. I delivered the results without anyone begin forced to give up their position. You make it happen through maintaining and enhancing relationships.
With StarkQ, one just persuades during negotiations by directly addressing things and showcasing that it is not right, using charisma/magnetism, or one just realizes what type of person youāre dealing with and uses their weakness against them directly(i.e I know this person is risk-averse, so I form my arguments around that), instead of fluidly in a certain indirect manner like with HoM.