Fast Action of Entrepreneurs, How?

How are entrepreneurs able to quickly build something whereas a normal man would spend time learning, thinking, hyping himself up. I just saw the series WeCrashed, and what was prominent that how Adam neumann sped up things . I have also read about the same characteristic in Elon Musk. Andrew Tate also talks about speed of execution. Are they extremely confident about their success or what?

Jesus Christ, this hit better than a cup of coffee.

1 Like

What skadoosh said

And you know what, once you try something, you have this liberating feeling of let me try again

And you try again

Because that fear that was there before has turned into “fuck it” lets do it again

2 Likes

Bro dont delete that gold nugget. It made me understand what i was doing for so long just being stuck in level 2

Enter this below into chatgpt. OR you could take action and ask yourself what subs and modules allow me to restructure my core identity and beliefs so I take action effortlessly.

there are 3 levels to get to achieving fast acting entrepenuer success.

  1. you ask how do i become successful
  2. you understand the identity, beliefs, subconcious structures, and pyschology keeping you from success. This can be a trap
  3. you start taking action even though your fear tries to stop you and understanding tries to make you justify the why before action
1 Like

I already copied the wisdom offline, kinda had a feeling it would be gone.

Just dont understand why it was removed

1 Like

You’re lucky, lol. That was the golden nugget, if there ever was one.

I removed it because it’s a rough draft/early access type of post. The core concept and structure is sound, but can be made even clearer. There is even more to it. For example:

Getting stuck at level 2 is because of level 3. Level 2 is the most important work, but level 3 is the fuel for the work. The wild part is that you can’t force level 3 because it’s a naturally developing capacity. There’s nothing you can actually do - it’s the equivalent of “the student just isn’t ready”. Sometimes you’re just not ready, and that’s the reality. A lot of what you see is not even the “work”’ as we know it, it’s naturally building the capacity to even be ready to do that “work”.

Anyways, you’ll see it again.

2 Likes

Here it is, if you or anyone else wanted it:

Instead of 3 levels, I added one more for clarity. And I made the whole thing a lot more simple.

So the TLDR is that the entrepreneurs are able to take fast action and build things quickly compared to the “normal” man because their level 2 is in check.

There are 4 levels. Level 1 is all of the surface level things. Knowledge, techniques, frameworks, and strategies. Most people fail at that because of level 2. Level 2 goes deeper into identities, nervous systems, subconscious conditioning, limiting beliefs, etc. Most people fail at that because of level 3. Level 3 is the natural, self-guided unfolding and capacity building on how to get through level 2. Most people fail at that because of level 4. Level 4 is the “I’m not at a point where I can build that capacity yet”. You can’t do anything at level 4 because it’s determined by your experience up to that point. Level 4 itself, is a capacity determined by your life so far. So you either keep experiencing life until it leads you to satisfy level 4, or it never does because it’s leading you to other things. This is the current, general default.

Most everyday people have no conception of level 2. You literally have hundreds of millions of people, running around with full blown scarcity programming packs, upper wealth limits, self-worth blocks, subconsciously associating being broke as being safe, money is sinful and rich people are evil, etc - the whole shebang and more. It can get real spicy like that, lol.

edit: I posted my thing into ChatGPT, and copied/pasted the explanation. I didn’t really read it, just glossed it over.

ChatGPT explanation

Yeah — within your model, that’s basically the thesis.

The important distinction is that Level 1 competence is not the same thing as Level 1 access. Two people can know the exact same strategy, but one can execute it almost immediately while the other encounters a whole invisible stack of resistance before behavior ever happens.

So when you see an entrepreneur rapidly go:

idea → decision → action → feedback → iteration → result

it can look like they simply possess better Level 1 knowledge. But your argument is that a huge part of the speed differential comes from less internal friction at Level 2.

They may still feel fear, uncertainty, embarrassment, rejection, financial risk, etc. The difference is that those signals don’t automatically become:

“Stop.”
“Wait until you’re ready.”
“Who do you think you are?”
“This is dangerous.”
“People will judge you.”
“Making a lot of money would make you a bad person.”

And that’s where your “scarcity programming pack” idea fits. Someone can consciously say:

“I want to make $500k/year.”

while simultaneously carrying implicit associations like:

wealth → greed
visibility → danger
selling → manipulation
failure → humiliation
success → separation from family/peers
being broke → familiar/safe
asking for money → shame
being powerful → morally suspicious

Those aren’t necessarily literal sentences running through someone’s head. That’s actually important. They can show up as procrastination, inexplicable avoidance, perfectionism, chronic “research,” underpricing, quitting when momentum appears, choosing low-upside opportunities, inability to tolerate uncertainty, etc.

So the person thinks:

"I have an execution problem."

Your model says:

Maybe. But the execution problem could merely be the visible Level 1 manifestation of a Level 2 constraint.

And then your recursion becomes:

Level 1: Can you execute the strategy?
↓ if not
Level 2: Can your current identity/nervous system/conditioning tolerate the behavior the strategy requires?
↓ if not
Level 3: Do you currently possess the capacity to notice, investigate, challenge, integrate, expose yourself, self-correct, and gradually reorganize Level 2?
↓ if not
Level 4: Has your life developed you to the point where that kind of self-directed transformation is even available to you yet?

I think Level 4 is the most radical part of your model, because it prevents the usual infinite regress of:

“Okay, just work on your limiting beliefs.”

“Why isn’t he doing that?”

“Because he needs more self-awareness.”

“Okay, tell him to develop self-awareness.”

“Why isn’t he doing that?”

Eventually you reach something like:

because the capacity required to intentionally build the capacity is itself not sufficiently developed.

That’s a real conceptual endpoint.

The one part I’d soften is “you can’t do anything at Level 4.” I understand what you mean, but taken literally it’s stronger than necessary. External experiences, relationships, crises, mentors, environments, responsibilities, consequences, luck, exposure to new ideas, and plain maturation can all alter the underlying capacity. The key is that the person may not yet be capable of deliberately engineering that change from inside the system.

That formulation preserves what I think you’re getting at:

Level 4 isn’t “this can never change.”
It’s “the machinery required to intentionally change it isn’t online yet.”

And therefore telling someone at Level 4 to “work on themselves” can be almost comically circular.

That’s also why the highly agentic entrepreneur and the everyday person can appear to inhabit completely different realities even when they’re consuming the same Level 1 information. One receives a framework and thinks:

"Cool. I’ll try that tomorrow."

The other receives it and unknowingly has to negotiate with twenty years of accumulated psychological machinery before sending one email.

From the outside, you just see that one guy sent the email and the other didn’t.


6 Likes

This one is good too. With subs like PEACE, its easier to move the ball forward.

The baseline which i took away is, act even if its uncomfortable or feels off.

2 Likes

Salute bro. Keep evolving

1 Like