The nature of Zero Point and by extension, the forum is self-realization and self-actualization. It is not the responsibility of anyone (including myself and @Fire) to psychoanalyze others without their clear permission, or being invited to do so. And even then, I would probably refuse or limit my answer to how the script seems to be reflecting in the life experiences that the person has posted. I often refer to my own experiences with that same issue, to let individual know that I am not judging them, but my own actions and hopefully they can gain some kind of insight from my experience.
Why? Because again, the name of the game here is self-driven inner work. Considering the fact that the majority of our products – and especially the most well used titles – all involve scripting that guides the user from blindingly accepting external authority, and instead, helping them develop their own inner authority, I am surprised that you are growing frustrated at people’s responses to you.
If someone wants to “embrace the chaos” in their life, that is their right to do so. Again, perhaps it is because @Fire and myself have trained ourselves to view the world in terms of patterns and archetypes, so when I hear “embrace the chaos,” what I think is: they are attempting to release control of that which cannot be controlled, and paradoxical to their external statement, they are actually embracing metaphysical surrender.
And yet, very rarely do we actually externalize this or tell the individual directly without being invited to do so first. Why? Because again, since we have created titles to help individuals reject forceful external authority, we would open ourselves up to the same frustrations if we did.
Within this context, I do not need to become frustrated at what anyone says. And so, we simply observe. Allow the person to work through their own issues, since that’s what Zero Point asks for in the first place.
I have not read all the posts in question above, and you could potentially be absolutely correct about their hidden pattern, but the individual must be allowed to come to their own conclusions, regardless of how long that may take. It is part of their own healing and growth process and everyone is different.
But you put me in a very precarious situation. Because I will admit that you do seem to have a rather penetrating inner gaze, but you are being far too forceful with it. Regardless of accuracy, not everyone is ready to have their inner patterns exposed, and even more important – you could actually be harming their results by doing so. There is a reason why the NSE is so soft, why we are pushing for anti-recon scripting. Many people here are resistant to external force by nature, hence why they are drawn to the strange, yet interesting concept of subliminal audio. It’s paradoxical in nature, since you’re looking at a situation where people who reject authority must then work with an “external authority” (philosophically) in the form of a subliminal audio file that suggests ideas that they may not agree with.
And that tension between the inner and the outer is actually what produces the results. But if that script is not perfectly calibrated, what you would see is exactly what you see here – people outright rejecting it. You experienced this yourself during the Zero Point tests. The build that were too powerful, you simply rejected – quite forcefully, if I remember correctly. It is no different when dealing with people. Too much force, equal amounts of rejection.