I doubt it.
Forget that I asked lol. You gonna have some crazy stories to tell tho.
From someone who also has quite a challenging chart, I do believe so.
See everything, feel everything, be ruled by nothing.
I doubt it.
Forget that I asked lol. You gonna have some crazy stories to tell tho.
From someone who also has quite a challenging chart, I do believe so.
See everything, feel everything, be ruled by nothing.
You just have to hold space for the frustration and integrate it, so any foundational title will help.
Most people assume that frustration is a problem to be solved. Their proposed titles all revolve around some variation of doing something to frustration:
But from the perspective youâre describing, thatâs still a reaction to the emotion itself.
The sequence looks like this:
Desired reality: âI want an ice cream truck business.â
Current reality: âI donât have one.â
Frustration arises.
Then most people immediately do:
âI need to get rid of this frustration.â
But now the frustration itself has become the new problem. Theyâre no longer relating directly to the unmet desire; theyâre fighting their emotional response to it.
What youâre pointing toward is closer to:
Notice the frustration.
Allow it.
Hold space for it.
Integrate it.
Stop treating it as an error that needs correction.
In that framework, frustration is information, not a malfunction. Itâs a signal that a desire exists and that current reality doesnât match it. The signal doesnât necessarily require immediate action, suppression, transcendence, or management.
Thatâs why terms like âdealing withâ or âovercomingâ can subtly reinforce the idea that the emotion shouldnât be there.
If I were naming the process youâre describing, Iâd choose something like:
Of those, âIntegrating Frustrationâ seems closest to the principle youâre emphasizing. It doesnât imply resistance, coping, fixing, enduring, or transcending. It implies that the emotion is permitted to exist and become part of your experience without becoming something you need to battle.
The subtle shift is from:
âHow do I get rid of frustration?â
to
âCan frustration be here without me needing to do anything about it?â
Thatâs a fundamentally different orientation.
Working on building your foundation is what allows you to have a greater capacity to hold space for processing.
Yes. In the framework youâre describing, âworking on your foundationâ isnât primarily about eliminating difficult emotionsâitâs about increasing your capacity to experience them without being compelled into a reactive cycle.
The pattern often looks like this:
A stronger foundation changes step 4.
Instead of:
âI feel frustrated, therefore I need to fix the frustration.â
it becomes:
âI feel frustrated. I can allow that experience to be here.â
The frustration may still exist, but you have enough stability, self-awareness, nervous system regulation, and emotional capacity to hold it without immediately trying to resolve it.
In that sense, the foundation isnât what removes the emotion. Itâs what increases your ability to process the emotion without resistance.
You could summarize the idea as:
The purpose of building a strong foundation is not to avoid difficult emotions, but to increase your capacity to hold space for them, process them, and integrate them without needing to react to them.
Or even more succinctly:
A stronger foundation creates a greater capacity for emotional processing.
That framing shifts the goal from emotional control to emotional capacity. The focus is no longer on getting rid of frustration, but on becoming someone who can fully experience frustration without being overwhelmed by it or compelled to escape it.
Havenât tried it yet but Stabilizer?
Also after few cycles of DRR you donât really feel bad emotions as much