Yes it’s a stupid question I know, but I want to be absolutely sure.
Are the new NSE Core modules in the Q store like all of the other cores, in the sense that the recommendation is still 2-3 cores max, including the new NSE stuff? Or can we add our typical amount of cores and the NSE cores are more like modules that are called cores?
These cores are not hitting that hard as normal cores
They answered before on this in the main thread for it.
Links or it didn’t happen.
Yeah I remember seeing this, they are as big as cores but much more smooth sailing. We should ask officially how many we can stack I guess after a certain point there is a lot of script and it must slow down.
People need to use bookmarks more often.
Needs some further testing for clear recommandations
So far, what I said earlier remains true. They are the length of your standard core, so we marked them as cores. But, they don’t seem to have the same effect on customs. As long as you don’t go crazy and add 3 standard cores, plus all three NSE cores, you’re probably good.
Though, I know someone is going to do this anyway.
LOL
So would 2 main cores + 2 NSE cores be overkill?
Invictus is doing one with 3 “regular” and 2 “new” cores I think 
He didn’t do 3 + 3 tho 
Yes. Just trying to determine all of the sub-technologies (like NWE, NLE, NRE, etc.) so that I can include them all in one section.
You should be alright. As long as you’re not trying to lawyer game and do EoG ST 4 and Khan Black ST 4 and say, “but y-y-y-ou said two cores!”
Though, we know someone is going to do this anyway.
Was thinking about this. If we look at the categories in the Q Store, it includes all the various sub-technologies.
Because they are very dense and already contain the cores of stages 1-3 kinda?
That’s because, like you, he is willing to take responsibility for his own experiments and choices.
If an experiment does not work, he’ll adjust it. If it does work, he’ll enjoy it.
But he won’t blame somebody else for what happens. Again, like you.
The more small details and nuances that someone asks about and tries to tie down, the clearer it is that the person is trying to eliminate unpredictable factors. Nothing wrong with that; but it often means that the person is not as interested in experimentation. And sometimes such a person is more likely to become disgruntled if something unpredictable does end up happening.
I think that if a person knows that they are feeling like this; then they should probably apply a generally conservative approach and stay well below the recommended limits. No journey is going to be 100% predictable; but the closer one adheres to the guidelines, the more that predictability can be maximized.
Indeed. I’ll PM you my latest experiment I’m about to undertake, if you can stomach seeing it 
Kidding. It isn’t THAT bad, but I won’t post it publicly.
