In the last two years, Subliminal Club has significantly expanded and augmented the program description structure and format for every new release. 1) There is the inspiring narrative prose section that communicates the essence, feel, and spirit of each program. 2) There’s the modular or module-like segmented feature description; under focused subheadings. 3) There are the bulletpointed concise feature summaries. And 4) there are the pro-tips at the very end.
Each one of these sub-sections is meant, I think, to connect with different types of readers or subliminal users. To make it easier for them to engage with and understand the programs.
It seems to me that the introduction of qOS is basically an extension of these descriptive enhancements. In other words, here in qOS you provide yet another option for people who may have another style (perhaps, more forum-based and dialogue-focused) of taking in information.
My question:
Just as a general estimate (I don’t mean this strictly quantitatively), what proportion/percentage of your responses might introduce ideas, information, and interpretations that are not already described in the program descriptions? I’m guessing about 5%?
I know that Saint, Fire (and maybe customer support?) also collaborate to create the responses here. Sometimes qOS may bring in additional ideas that might be fresh from Saint’s or Fire’s mind or that might draw on conversations here on the user forum.
One great use for qOS is to explore between-program comparisons or to imagine synergistic inter-program effects. So those are of course not in the program descriptions in as much detail. Another might be custom subliminal stack analyses.
Second question:
Any suggestions on how else we users might best use this resource? (Assume that we are willing, able, and motivated to closely read the program descriptions.) Sometimes it seems to me that users routinely underemphasize the role of Conscious Guidance and internal factors, and sometimes over-depend on cookbook style prescriptive orientations to the programs. What would be your advice about how to approach thinking creatively about subliminal use?
If this is too much, just answer the parts that are appropriate. I’m still figuring out what to ask to qOS and what to Support. Thank you!