Okay so my next question is what is everyones opinion on ZP and Qv2? Like benefits of one or the other other than time to listen to them. For example I am running Emperor ZP for now twice every other day for almost a week and have noticed results. But would I be better off listening to the Qv2 and running a ZP to go along with it? I apologize for my ignorance in all this but I genuinely would like opinions to help me figure out the best path for me. I am also aware that if I am convinced to use Emperor Qv2 I should not use the ZP
ZP.
Generates faster results, more convenient (less listening time), causes less reconciliation (when used properly, PLEASE follow the listening instructions and guidelines), and is written in a way where you are controlling the experience.
6 Likes
ZP hits much faster/deeper. I still like Q/QV2. It’s really just different tools, though.
If you want a quicker assessment of which titles are best for you as safely and quickly as possible, ZP for sure is my opinion.
1 Like
Thank you and yeah I am following the schedule properly!
Okay dope! Thank you for the quick reply
1 Like
The Q versions will be phased out at some point anyway. Now the real question is do you like new faster and more evolved tech or do you like older still fast tech?
1 Like
New and Faster haha
1 Like
The support articles Introduction to Zero Point and Community Created Article: How is ZP “better” than Qv2? may help clarify things.
2 Likes
Thank you!
1 Like
At least one ZP sub should be included in your stack if you want to still use Qv2.
To be honest, I hope SC don’t phase out the Q versions but we’ll see what happens. For subs like Emperor and Wanted, I’d want the Q version to still stick around to be honest.
1 Like
iPhone SE or iPhone 18 Plus Pro Max Ultra?
There you go 
2 Likes
much better and no virus or trojaner. apps are obsolet. you can see your partner in high quality 3d. Better than anything else 
4 Likes
Yeah, I’m kinda in limbo about this as well.
A few months ago it was "Qv2 is the most best-est, most effective-est, most efficient-est, most uncomperable-est, most most modern-est, most unparalleled-est, most faster-est, most results-est, most this and that-est.
And now, supposedly it’s all that and then some with ZP. Not sure if I completely buy into the hype… I mean, if Qv2 was all that, then why is ZP all that much better-est to such a high degree? Why would ZP make Qv2 obsolete with all the “most amazing-est” results of Qv2 in the past?
Edit: I’m having good results on ZP
1 Like
Tech is constantly being updated and innovated. It’s literally that simple. Why wouldn’t you want to make better tech that blasts away your previous work if you can?
I mean that’s why phones/computers/tablets etc come out each year right? They’re made to be better than the previous. Q/v2 came out a while ago. They were already working on tech to beat that which was Q+ And instead ZP arrived.
3 Likes
These articles might help explain: Introduction to Zero Point and Community Created Article: How is ZP “better” than Qv2?.
2 Likes
If all things between ZP and Qv2 were identical, ZP would still be a better option by virtue of having a 15-minute runtime (which IMO is actually better at 7 minutes), versus an hour. That alone makes ZP the best subliminal technology on planet Earth.
2 Likes