- Khan
- Godlike Masculinity: The Commander
- Emperor (one of the variants)
- primal
0 voters
Why is the original Godlike Masculinity not even there 
We need the alpha subliminal expert @Fire to weigh in on this.
2 Likes
I mean… it’s an artisanal line and somewhat of a direct upgrade + updated no? Or am I missing something?
Didn’t even give stark a chance…
Regular title here :
Love Bomb 
4 Likes
E:) Stark
for me khan is the ultimate, for a lightweight sub maybe ascension
1 Like
Depends on the individual’s definition of masculinity
Could be Emperor for one, Wanted Black for another, or Stark for a third.
And that’s why there are so many “alpha” sub products lol, the power of choice for the individual
1 Like
GLM:C is the upgrade of the original Commander, it’s just part of the GLM product line now. GLM is a separate title still.
Ascension should be in the list too 
2 Likes
Dragon Reborn Red should be on the list as well, at least to compete with KHAN, which is the clear winner considering its 4 titles
Wohooooo!!!
4 Likes
Khan gave me the most “stereotypical masculine” traits, like going for what you want, taking action, ass kicking motivation etc. Emperor felt powerful too but more low-key. Primal was like a much lighter, more fun version of Khan. Haven’t tried the commander, always liked the badass artwork though
3 Likes
It’s not even close as masculine as GLM. So better say that he didn’t even give a chance to GLM
I didn’t say Stark wasn’t masculine. I said it was not even close as masculine as GLM. Different things.
2 Likes
If you take a close look at all the alpha or seduction related titles, you’ll see that a basic common foundational quality is inner confidence.
This ranges from the titles for women like Seductress all the way to Khan. This is by design - one cannot begin to put into practice the more higher-order concepts until one has a basic grasp on self-confidence, otherwise they’ll start saying things like “oh, that’s not really me” or go into reconciliation with the good old “the title isn’t working”.
How can one experiment with becoming more dominant, seductive or suave if one is afraid to even open their mouth?
So, all titles will naturally work on your base level of “alphaness”. Not to say that is the only factor that gets improved (as there are many), but it is one example I can give to demonstrate how all titles can fit.
Then the distinctions start appearing - again, if one takes a close look, they’ll notice that these are very different types of “alphaness”.
Some people naturally already have a very high base level of “alphaness”, and instead need to refine it. Stark, Renaissance Man and Primal are excellent fits to balance this out. Without balancing it out, all you achieve is people not wanting to talk to you. Counter-productive for nearly all goals.
And some people lack that basic “alphaness” edge. They might already have the softer qualities - they can be suave, they can be witty, but they lack the “oomph”. No one takes them seriously - again, counter-productive. Khan, Godlike Masculinity, Emperor (although Emperor is quite versatile and can be used in both cases) will be an excellent fit to give more “oomph” and power behind the softer qualities.
Some people can have issues with both - lacking the soft and the hard qualities. No oomph, and yet no slickness, wittiness, intelligence to fall back on. A combination of titles is excellent, and as are more general titles. Emperor generally.
Some people can have both but have them completely mixed up, or be unaware of their qualities and who they are. They can come off intimidating but not even realize it themselves, thus missing out on many opportunities. They can come off flirty and have people be into them, but not realize it and thus be unable to reproduce it.
Now, does this mean any of the “softer” titles are “feminine”, or a “harder” title is “macho”? Hell no. The words soft and hard are simply referring to more refined qualities versus more rough qualities. A radiation detector versus a sledgehammer.
An individual without the “oomph” i.e “harder” qualities running Stark will still develop the same necessary oomph, just that the focus is more on the ingenuity, intelligence, wittiness, charisma parts of Stark. But if there is a serious hole in one’s inner qualities, the subconscious mind through the utilization of the subliminal title will naturally strive to fill that hole - equilibrium.
Hence why some people report the usual dominance and status increase on Khan, and yet others talk how it helped them refine themselves further, out of the detrimental “dominance is king” mindset. How for some Stark helped them achieve a greater level of suaveness and intelligence, and for others how Stark is the ultimate masculinity title helping them revolutionize their love life.
So, the question, the ultimate masculinity title - that depends on you and what you want to achieve. If you have any serious character flaws that are holding you back from executing the title, they will be tackled by most titles. You cannot achieve greater and greater results if your foundation is flimsy. It’s inevitable, and the biggest things you want to avoid addressing - will have to be addressed eventually.
You cannot lie to Zero Point.
14 Likes
Honestly the ultimate Masculine sub depends on the user …
I would say Ascension is probably the best because it’s the fastest acting “alpha” sub… There is so much that goes into masculinity and masculine energy…
It also depends on what the user needs or works best with… Not every one that needs masculinity frame can run khan or emperor… might be too much for them or affect them based on their pasts negatively till they heal more…
I am surprised Chosen isn’t on here or Stark Black
1 Like
Again everyone:
What are you wanting to accomplish?
HOW do you want to accomplish that?
My masculine approach is weighed to charm, charisma, humor, and leadership - partially as an attempt to transcend my AI subroutines.
2 Likes
I voted for Khan, lol.
3 Likes