I am of a similar opinion, that fear of success is born of two conditions:
- having any kind of expectation (both of result and the work to get there)
- misjudging both the cost and benefits of doing, and the cost and benefits of not doing.
If we didn’t have any expectation, we would just do it regardless without thinking about the result or cost.
if we judged correctly, then we would see that the cost of doing nothing is greater than the cost of doing, and the benefit of doing nothing is lesser than the benefits of doing.
and I think this is true even taking the immaterial into account,
from what I see, to get material things and abilities, we need material events and actions.
and to get immaterial things and abilities, we need immaterial events and actions.
and I see immaterial things like a result booster for material actions.
Therefore, working on both the material and immaterial is optimal for any result.
So what I mean by that, is that though we need to work out (material action) to get strong (material ability), we get more strength with less work if we train our mind for resilience, for optimal use of our muscles, for pushing what needs to be pushed to optimize for strength gain and strength deployment.
so someone with less physical training but a good mental conditioning (both conscious/unconscious) can get on par with someone with more physical training but lesser mental conditioning.
There have been instances of athlete hypnotised into not being able to lift a pen, and otherwise regular people hypnotised in order to lift heavy weights. But for the same mental conditioning, like with two athletes following a similar mental regiment, then the physical training would make the difference.
another exemple, is that though we need to act to get a business going, it’s our mental training and abilities that will be able to notice opportunities or give the skills needed to perform well.
The immaterial (mental and astral) boost the manifestations, but with no path to manifestation, no actions, it become much much harder.
it’d be hard to meet the president if sitting naked in the back of a cave. (though chance event could happen, but yeah, less possibilities)
Though of course the immaterial can influence the material, such as with energetic events (including the aura/biofield and communication through it, leading to syncronicities), but the material has much more inertia than the immaterial, since it got a much much greater mass than things like electrons, and so it takes either more time or more energy to bring change. (This, I suppose, might be the reason why physical shifting subs use more energy than subs with auras, and subs with auras more energy than subs without, though only fire or saint would know for sure)
So yeah, it all depend on what we desire to attain, on what is our definition of success, if it’s something material like monetary wealth, a strong body, or to have material influence, actions are needed to provide enough mass and give enough power and inertia going to quickly change things.
If it’s something immaterial like working on aura, working on energy, aura, skills, mindset, knowledge, behavior, seeing, hearing, feeling, then you don’t need much actions.
You can easily become popular in a town, city or neighborhood with good mental condition and without much actions, but it still require going out.
You can easily find friends or even love, but it still require talking (physical action)
But in all case, to get material results, we’ll need at least some material actions. especially if we want them to last (have inertia)
the immaterial got many gains, but they can only be fully materialized through material and physical actions, exertions. (and indeed, I see the material without immaterial as the hard road with little gain, with no skills or mindset acting can be a struggle, hence why there’s a need for both)
edit: (and if I may hazard a metaphysical guess, I’d say if we incarnated here in a body on this Earth it may be for a reason, or we would have stayed immaterial from the beginning)