No, rather the opposite. 1 title, less minutes in some cases and more space between days
I get that there is concern around safeguarding IP that stops the more detailed explanations from being given, but as a programmer and critical thinker or process oriented person, knowing how the damned thing works ā¢ is super handy, so you can treat a stack programmatically or tune it. At the moment Iām working more off intuition and past experience.
1 Like
What your saying then is the official guidelines is invalid for ZPv2?
Watch in the pdf if you purchased a product after ZPv2 release
Let me see in my downloads
What i say is in the last updated guidelines, itās in the support page
1 Like
I read the pdf file
The same guidelines
I reread it, according to that, it is OK to listen to 2 loops of the same title if itās ZP.
No different for ZPv2 then?
I hear that some miss the Primer and still like to have it, but that can be achieved with Ascension Chamber?
1 Like
I canāt confirm it
But logic tells me
If ZPv2 is just ZP without primer
Why not?
Itās no more than two listens of any ZP track during the same listening session.
For example, on the same day, you can listen to sub A twice or sub A once and sub B once. Nothing else.
2 Likes
Yeah thatās what I thought, just some of the above comments confused me.
Canāt wait for Master Class.
1 Like
"Or even the same Sub twice in a row, one in ZPv1 and other in ZPv2?
-Donāt ever do this"
Why not?
They are the same tech
1 title just lacks the primer
Why? You donāt know the tech better than the people who created it. Why not just follow their instructions?
1 Like
Are there dogmas here?
Iāve read a lot of explanations about a lot of minor or not so relevant themes in the forum
What stops me from knowing the basics of a product i buy
1 Like
If you want recon, go ahead.
Just because of a primer?
So, previously to ZPv2 we were all ādoomedā to recon just because the titles had a primer?
Iām not saying that we were doomed with that tech.
Saint answered and already said thereās no reason to run V1 when we have V2.
He mentioned recon because of the primer. Iām also sure he spoke about the primer or somewhere else here on the forum talking about it having healing or something in it. I may be wrong but I remember something about that comment.
But it blows my mind why you would run a older V1 tech with an upgraded V2 tech - upgraded because of the primer.
Maybe for experimentation?
Maybe you got results with the primer
And want to know what happens if you mix the 2 versions
But what i find funny are the serious and definitive assertions:
āDonāt ever do thisā
This type of claim demands an explanation
1 Like
Experiment if you wish. Donāt come crying when youāve got recon.
Iām so sorry, itās pretty obvious why Iād make that claim.
Like I said, if you want recon then go ahead.
1 Like
Itās not obvious.
And donāt use threat.
Iām so sorry but youāre gonna have to quit it with the attitude immediately.
2 Likes