Adding this to my “watching” list. Nice idea. Lots of these questions come up and it’s not even @answergroup’s main job to answer that that’s technically more like a forum ambassador’s thing at first glance, then, if it’s complicated, go to answergroup.
IMO … that’s a stack with dense scripting but focused results, so it looks good. And a lot of people seem to be running Khan + Khan Black with great results. I think that given a long enough time horizon, you would get great results with this, but the downside of this stack is that you’ll get slower results on Khan, because there’s just SO much scripting.
To adjust it, I’d say it might be better to develop a familiarity with K/KB before adding on WB. Or at least, prioritize listening to mainly K/KB until you’ve completed all 4 cycles. For example, your stack schedule throughout stages 1-4 could be like this.
Mon: K/KB
Wed: WB
Fri: K/KB
Sat/Sun:Rest
Mon: K/KB
Wed: WB
Fri: K/KB
Sat/Sun:Rest
I would just be mindful of taking longer washouts, and possibly putting a solo-title stack in your cycle rotation once every 3-4 cycles. You could solo WB to let K/KB bloom, and to get some additional WB exposure (especially if you’re doing the above cycle method)
OR, you could solo Genesis, which is such a good solo cycle and such a good results integrator it’s insane.