cutest subclub couple
1 Like
You know I get on you constantly about sticking with a stack 
1 Like
@Saiyan4Blue Thanks for the answer regardless!
This makes sense for sure. Clarification was needed.
Your also probably right, although a wider focus is also okay for long term use.
I mean even three cycles are enough to āsolve a problemā you have started it because of.
If itās not a big issue and you solved it, donāt see a reason to keep on running it. Some people donāt stay on sub for even a cycleā¦
Glad you are running a long term one though 
pity you run it for 2 instead of 3 cycles as recommended but I guess whatever suits you.
1 Like
KB was recommended 3 full cycles per stage?
Where did you see that? I thought I was overkilling it with 2 cycles per stage
Also never heard of that. Still, having in mind the rule of 2 cycles per stage.
And rules must be obeyed
Any custom counts as one subliminal. So one slot.
2 Likes
youre missing out my friend
For any sub it takes at least 3 cycles to actually do some significant lasting change in general. Now some may have it differently but thats my experience. It only makes sense to take your time with each stage also. 3 should be a norm imo.
2 Likes
Seems quite lively on this thread today 
7 Likes
1 is ārecommendedā
Personally I found three to be sweet spot as it takes you out the initial marveling phase
Through the self discovery phase
And then a cycle to milk the gained momentum
4 Likes
Everyone processed subs differently. For example, Mighty Qatar Prince Invictus can see results in span of hours after he listened to a title, whereas others like you are okay with 3 cycles. Maybe for someone is ok 6 cycles or 1 cycle. Every mind is unique and different.
And for me, a high priority is what Saint usually says. And he said around 2 cycles.
1 Like
3 cycles per stage is crazy lol, nearly 9 months before you get to ST 4
Iāll try it for Khan in 2024 tho
longer you stay one each stage, better and deeper results you get. Some people here run a sub for over a year be it multi stager or not. Sure you can get results and maybe you get super insane results compared to others. I wil for now assume you dont
2 Likes
Sure with that logic we can say 6 months are better than three and one year is better than 6 months. Would you stay on one stage for one year then?
no I think that running one stage for three cycles makes it exactly one year for all stages (there are always 4 of them)
1 Like
Ok, I respect your opinion.
Me too man and I dont doubt you are getting great results with however you run your stuff.
With toast, butter, and raspberry jam. Lovely combination.
3 Likes
What happen to Achilles? Did you evolve?
he is no more with us, poor boy 
He was shot to Achillesā Heel