Receptivity and masculinity

When you are receptive you are feminine
When you penetrate in the world and put your peint on tue world you become masculine
What are the thoughts about the subclub scripts on the matter.
I believe pure masculinity is not good, because you will be crazy polarizing, and I think that pure masculinity is in KHAN

Why would you believe pure masculinity is not good? What exactly do you think masculinity is?

Well
I dont have that exact explanation
But you know, sth like going somewhere and just commanding
Do this, do this… another form is persuading your ideas on others. Sth like that
Like you and your opinion affects the world, not the other way
Like sometime someone says sth and it is right and you agree with it
Its kinda receptivity you know
Its like calibration in social situation(primal seduction) when there is someone who’s external game is powerful than you. He is masculine and you automatically become feminine.
Sth like
I said, I am not sure. I come here and say what are the thoughts. And you ask me question.
You are the junior alchemist, I aint. You wanna dominate socially by asking rethorical questions or give me your thought? Your choice

You know its like you just create sth in the world
Like you stick, like you have ego
Ego aint anything but subconcious thoughts
You just project and don’t receive
When you meditate you loosen up the thoughts and become receptive
And it makes you more feminine
Sth like that
Like eminem is very masculine
Cuz he just raps and dominate other is the modern way

2 Likes

When you just penetrate the world
People notice
And they will get hostile
If you have enough external power and influence tp fuck them up, ok go on
If you cant, your masculinity will fuck you up
In today’s societies being independent is hard
Especially in countries like mine
You know I was always thinking about a sub like gengis khan. But it does not work
Gengis khan is always more masculine than amyone on this forum
But in this age that much masculinity is going to kill you
Like saddam hussain, ghaddafi…
That is what I think
And I am not sure about it

3 Likes

You don’t need to worry about that. I run Khan for more than a year and I did not turn into a hyper-masculine commanding dick.

More power? Yes

More status? Yes

More sex? Yes

But I am still a normal human being somewhat functioning in society and not some extreme archetype.
Though before you start running Khan, I would greatly recommend you to first have a foundation with Emperor.

7 Likes

Sorry I wrote that wrong
I meant that Khan has more of the masculinity I define than other subs
Not pure really. I am not planning on running khan
At least before the ZP
I just wanted to know the thoughts on masculinity

1 Like

@Alphamale dont worry you can consuisly guide khan its not like it forces you to be 100% masculine.

2 Likes

I don’t think I’ve ever seen pure masculinity. I myself am very high on that scale, somewhere around 80-90% and I already notice that it’s hard to hook into my empathetic feminine side in order to relate to people. Solution-based thinking also often leads to overcoming a problem through eliminating it rather than finding a suitable compromise.

Where it shines is when you find the rare partner having the exact opposite. A relationship between an 80/20 male and 20/80 female tends to be extremely passionate. Very rare unfortunately. Difficult to find the more polarized individuals nowadays.

Around 70/30% is about right for most people, it allows them a sense of identity and avoids confused feelings or unhappiness.

I have to wonder, looking at the world right now, if there’s a trend heading towards a 50/50% generation. Some call it evolution, letting go of an outdated concept. Less fireworks, less conflict, more status quo. I myself don’t know what to think. I like my challenges, they help me grow.

Either way, that’s a discussion which is best held somewhere else.

All SubClub subs tend to stimulate the development of a healthy amount of intuitive and emotional expression, including Khan. It helps with connecting to people and networking.

There are some cases on the forum where people become a complete a-hole and think it is their masculinity expressing themselves. But those tend to be temporary and are often people who’ve had that side of them oppressed or suppressed for a large part of their lives. They always balance out in time.

We used to see a lot of that on the older Emperors.

No comment. :wink:

2 Likes

Hope this is not Off-topic.

But now that you mentioned Khan and Emperor.

Some say Khan gave them a rich sexual life.

Does Emperor do the same?

It kind of is, but it’s holday-season, I’ll let it go like Elsa. :wink:

Generally, no. Emperor is more likely to cause a form of social isolation. It is so focused on generation of success and power that the listener often only surrounds themselves with the people that can offer them value. No small talk or wasting time on courtship. They won’t mind friends with benefits or one-night stands though. We all need to blow off some steam every now and then.

There have been some people with improvements in their social lives. But that probably takes a strong desire to have those in order to drive the sub against the current, and I have to wonder if they are not better off on a different sub.

The more recent Emperors are more balanced. Still, it’s not what the sub is for. In that case, stick to another sub.

Thanks brother
Yeah, khan and every other alpha male subs have social calibration
And its amazing in climbing power dynamics
Today cannot be the age of gengis Khan. You’ll just get urself f**
Another question :raising_hand_man:t2:
Do you completely agree with my concept of masculinity?

Emperor can improve your sex life however it seems to have attract younger women who have lacked a father figure.

Whaaaat?? I had sex with a girl who kept saying she had daddy issues on Khan hahaha it was great sex!