QTKS core limits with stack

Questions and Comments
#1

@SaintSovereign @Fire @RVconsultant

so I decided to go with QTKS but was confused on the whole process

if I have a QTKS sub with two cores (primal seduction and lbfh) and run It with my wanted black name embed, with that be considered a full stack since I have two cores in QTKS and one core in WB?

or could I still run one more sub

I just want to make sure I have all my basis covered.

#2

A custom with more than one core still counts as one sub. I’ve never heard that QTKS is treated differently. And if, it should allow for more since the integration is much smoother.

It could be the case that a custom is pretty dense and you should run it solo for a cycle, as Fire recommended recently for a RoM+RoS custom.

It also makes a huge difference if you’ve run the cores before. Adding two cores you’ve run for half a year will be easier then running a custom with two new cores.

But generally, you can run multiple customs with multiple cores.
Just consider that the more cores you use, the longer it takes to see results.

4 Likes
#3

Thanks for the clarification,

So lets say I use a QTKS with primal and limit destroyer(have ran both in the past for 5 months) and emperor with less than 10 modules

and stack it with my lbfh custom(one core) no more than 10 modules

and my WB name embed

Will that be considered a lot to process and take longer to see results

#4

I think you’ll fare better making qtks on a custom you’ve ran for a while

Otherwise you may end up not liking it

Or realise it could do better with certain modules added or removed

Why primal with emperor? I feel like that sounds very similar to what khan is there to achieve :thinking:

#5

I’ve ran primal with good results(5 months) and emperor I’ve ran before on a custom for 3 cycles

primal seems to be what I should’ve kept running instead of WB tbh

Emperor for the wealth part

1 Like