On it, thank you for letting us know.
Oh, so it’s based on likes?
First a not so brief note, then we will get back on topic.
I am well aware of the blackpill idea about women highly valuing looks. And there are reasons for it.
I am going to list points about this:
1 For years I’ve suspected that women (because of social media) have this illusion of choice: all these men to choose from, so how to filter out what she thinks are her best options? So what strategy might women use? Looks, height, income. Which all have nothing to do with if a man can provide a quality relationship. I know that even with all these choices, I’ve known women who are dismayed how they can have all these apparent choices, yet no one they are truly interested in. Often I’ve found, it has to do with the men being described as boring or lacking in social skills or having a bland personality.
2 Men filter by looks.
3 I’m aware of the research that women only find less than 10% of the men attractive, whereas men are likely to find a wide variety of women attractive. However what I think this study fell short of was the analysis of consensus versus idiosyncratic tastes. In other words, men may have a consensus of which women are attractive, and that consensus is much higher than women. However as individuals, each individual woman may find many different men attractive BUT as a group, there is little consensus among those individual tastes. In other words, each woman out of a group of 10 women might find 20 men out of 100 attractive. BUT the overlap might only be labeling 5 of the same men attractive, yet each individual women might personally find 15 other men attractive, in which each of those 15 men is somewhat unique to each woman, and those unique tastes have little to no overlap.
4 Women are likely to filter by a variety of personality factors. (See point 1 above.)
5 Attachment style might be another factor that is not being considered. In other words, what type of attachment style might a woman have if she is heavily invested in a man’s looks? Is she thinking of him more as a person or an object (e.g., status symbol, success symbol, to make her friends jealous, etc.)?
6 If a woman is heavily invested in looks, what kind of values might she have? How dedicated is she to personal growth?
7 Social media might glorify image and appearance, leading to valuing looks.
8 If you are a man reading this, how obsessed are you with how women look?
9 If you are thinking about those podcasts that have up to 15 women sitting around a table discussing things, please keep in mind that many of these women might be from a restricted demographic, be there hoping to (indirectly) promote their OF site, be limited in their social skills, etc. And that means they may not be representative of women as a group.
10 I’ve found the best way to meet women is NOT online. Actually talk to them at the places you frequent, or at a meetup group, or at your place of worship. I’m actually stunned at how open some women can be, and overjoyed, that they are having an actual conversation with a real, live man.
Men, please stop worrying so much about your looks. I’d love to wake up tomorrow and look better than Brad Pitt ever did. But I’m not going to invest much time or energy into that. If you’re concerned about your looks, how about focus on your HEALTH?
Leadership. Social status. Social skills. Charisma. Mental health. Physical health. These such things can benefit you more than looks because they can keep growing your whole life. Looks fade.
Comparison is the thief of joy
Also, heartmaxxing/soulmaxxing > looksmaxxing
It’s what actually matters at the end of the day
Tldr of the post,
shortly we are hardwired to different things when it comes to sex, attraction. we(men) are simply turned on by beauty and youth, women needs different things and I think it can simply seen by looking to stone age humans because we -human nature still stuck in there- and I think young and good looking men are not enough to protect women’s offsprings ie women’s genes, and gene selfish, and I think this is why the qualities you’ve written here more important than looks, not only it may fade.
Women were attracted the men who are good hunters and protectors, which is more important for babies survival than looks, but still I think being sexually turning on for women is not enough to sex with men, because they need to if you’re gonna stick with them, care her and potential baby, of course people has birth control techniques,
but we know this with our rational mind(new), when it’s come to sex, is our rational mind in control or the instincts and feelings (genes)-old things-?
But still I think everyone should try to be physcially attractive as possible. Men or women… I think it’s a responsibility and should be norm and linked to health.
You all should read The Courage to be Disliked
Let’s get back on topic, everyone.
Can you answer my question please?
Must be huuuuuuge!
Paragon sleep is a sleeper
All I want is The Beast Update xd
Question?
“Is Emperor Executive in any way related to Emperor Black?”

@Fire - Emperor: The Executive
He’s not done with Emperor yet. While he’s keeping the details close to the chest, he has assured me that he most certainly intends to honor the Emperor brand as well as customer expectations. Whether this will serve as a “spin-off” or another foundational Emperor title – I’m not sure. See if you can get him to tell.
I dunno. If @fire tells, he tells.

“Is Emperor Executive in any way related to Emperor Black?”
This is a super long answer and a lot of spoilers about the upcoming release, so if you don’t like spoilers, don’t read:
Have you ever had a dream that that you um you had you’d you would you could you’d do you wi you wants you you could do so you you’d do you could you you want you want him to do you so much you could do anything?
LMAO
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Well played
Those next 2 upgrades are beyond genius especially if they will also be in early ZPU
New Executive will skyrocket action-taking whcih is the bedrock success and wealth, subs or no subs. New True Social elevates the flow of social/attraction subs bypassing the single biggest problem people have with them.
These 2 subs are essentially free flow factor for the rest of the stack, flow and hard-hitting dopamine highs from seeing results, the pathways to manifestation will burst open and that’s when life becomes truly magical. Anyone observant enough will see the tremendous value available here. In 2025, the only way to fail with Subclub is by not using a stack of 2-3 subs according to the instructions and by being hellbent on taking no action

Have you ever had a dream that that you um you had you’d you would you could you’d do you wi you wants you you could do so you you’d do you could you you want you want him to do you so much you could do anything?
Omg, this might be the sub that destroys my stack completely…forever. I wouldn’t need anything else tbh haha