On Archetypes: ♾️

[Malkuth]

Remember: subliminal programs offer Archetypes.

An Archetype is a primary, basic pattern. Archetypes are pure and undifferentiated. They are Universal and Ideal.

When an archetype is expressed in reality, it transforms to become Specific and Differentiated.

An example of an archetype is BIRD.

So, Eagle, Sparrow, Hummingbird, Peacock, Vulture, Crow, Owl; these are all diverse expressions of the same underlying BIRD archetype.

Every unique flavor that you find at Häagen-Dazs, Baskin Robbins, or Ben and Jerry’s, is an expression of an underlying ICE CREAM archetype.

Those diverse outcomes are all expressing the same archetype.

The archetype of a subliminal program combines with your personality and is interpreted by your mind. The result is a unique outcome that is your individual, specific “version” of the universal, underlying archetype.

So don’t expect to precisely replicate someone else’s subliminal journey. Your journey and your results will be perfect for you.

[praisetheurdtree]

This is exactly what I needed to read right now.

[Sage_Ninjistic]

Pure, indivisible potential manifested in interchanging, constantly realized differentiated actuality.

The ultimate ‘archetype’ being the All That Is.

Thanks, Malkuth

[Skadoosh]

Great post you’ve written lol.

As you said, the archetype is universal/ideal and transforms to be specific/unique/differentiated.

However, the universal/ideal aspect of the archetype needs JUST AS MUCH emphasis as the specific/unique/differentiated.

ALL birds, have 2 legs and lay eggs.

If one looks past those basic/universal characteristics of the archetype, then it can create a distorted view of logic in that “oh everything is unique and personalized”, like no it’s not lol. It’s very similar to leftism nonsense and it can act as a very attractive cop-out… I’ll tell you why.

The reason why this is so important is because the larger tendency that the individual has in looking past that, the more likely it is that they’re using it as a coping mechanism to stray away from development in those basic/universal characteristics of the archetype. This can cause them to get slower results with the subliminal because they are running away through a distorted logic/framing. They will most definitely, metaphorically speaking… get their ass kicked eventually.

If one solely focuses on how different their journey is, then they will use that logic to settle further into the vortex of safety and use that to further delay their embodiment of that which is basically universal. It’s leveraging safety by emphasizing the other side of the scale.

Also, while you are correct in that the outcome is unique since it’s the individual’s version… you aren’t taking into account that commonality of belief systems/interpretations exists which are the main driving factors in integrating an archetype (especially an archetype that has mainstream appeal/context).

Perceptually speaking, most of us aren’t that different. We’ve picked up similar beliefs throughout society, through movies, tv, culture, education systems, parents, mainstream, internet, group mind, etc. To believe that we are that different and unique in our interpretations and how we would integrate an archetype (which is also itself based on a mainstream thought) makes sense but at the same time doesn’t. I would argue that our journeys with certain archetypes would be more similar, than they would be different, despite being unique to the individual. That’s actually quite evident on the forum.

I also suspect that this applies to whatever words they use in the script.

For example: take the word “Honor”. While everyone has their own unique interpretation of what that means to THEM. I guarantee you that if you zoomed out, in the grand scheme of things those interpretations would all be very similar. The same applies to words like “Masculinity”.

I’m sure you know everything about what I’m talking about, I’m just going 1 step further into the analysis.

[King]

I’m reminded of a post I made on archetypes a while back…

Most people who succeed in life, they have some sort of capital that is expressed in intellectual, emotional, social, physical, financial or institutional forms.

At the same time, a person’s archetype makes it easier to acquire and utilize certain types of capital to achieve their goals.

For example, the type of capital that is best for Athlete archetype to achieve his goals would be different from that for a Sage archetype or a Joker archetype.

Apart from that, the environment we are born in often distorts our perceptions about what we really need and want, and how we should go about using the right types of capital to achieve our goals.

So in a sense, there is a strong nature vs nurture theme in everyone’s life.

So I guess at the end of the way, it is really important that we learn about ourselves and find out what we really want.

[Malkuth]

@Skadoosh

However, the universal/ideal aspect of the archetype needs JUST AS MUCH emphasis as the specific/unique/differentiated.

The universal archetype is emphasized in the Program Descriptions and in the Objectives lists.

The specific, personalized expression, in turn, is emphasized in the goals that a person chooses, the actions she takes, and (to some extent) in the experiences and manifestations that people observe in their lives and (sometimes) choose to share on this discussion forum.

Indeed, both are inseparably linked in this process of working with subliminals as aids to growth and development.

@Skadoosh

Also, while you are correct in that the outcome is unique since it’s the individual’s version… you aren’t taking into account that commonality of belief systems/interpretations exists which are the main driving factors in integrating an archetype (especially an archetype that has mainstream appeal/context).

I don’t believe that I made a statement addressing this point anywhere in my original post. For the sake of clarity, however, I will say, yes; human beings do share many concepts, belief systems, and patterns of interpretation and response (action) in common.

The degree of value, importance, or even emphasis that a given individual places on perceived similarities or differences is influenced by a range of dynamic factors, many of which are quite subjective in nature.

As a rule, one thing we can say is that when a given area is of extreme significance to a person, then that person will tend to place more value on subtler and finer distinctions and differences. The passionate football afficionado pays rapt attention to every feature of the field, every substitution in and out of the game, every play and every tactic. In contrast, the non-fan can barely tell the teams apart.

So how different or similar are we? And who gets to even choose and define the terms for comparison? I’ll leave that one to the debating team.

But I will say that after reading and reflecting on the Archetypes of the Subliminal Club program descriptions, you have to use your own integrity, your own dreams, and your own honest review of your life conditions and circumstances to set your initial goals and your own desired actions.

And even after you’ve done that, prepare to be surprised, educated, and reset, again and again. (If you already knew the whole thing, you wouldn’t be learning or evolving. So thank goodness for this.)

Wash. Rinse. Repeat.

[Skadoosh]

Nevermind, I read your post wrong, lol