I used to place Stark and SS together I loved it.
This is only the model. Sexual skills and Seduction in a subconscious model, I am. not sure Khan is focused like that 
1 Like
Stark and SS makes much more sense than Khan + SS.
Before getting that custom, I would certainly advise you to try that combination with major titles beforehand hehe 
1 Like
Yeah, I might remove it men the choice is hard!! I added SS after Invictus suggested to add it since I’m a big fan of SS.
I’d have to replace it by another module that either his boldness or sex/seduction, do you have suggestions regarding this?
Fenrir, Fearsome and Rogue are for me must have modules.
Fenrir especially is incredible and would fit that custom nicely
2 Likes
I’ve seen it mate it seems very very good in terms of boldness!! Thank you I thought fenrir was some protection subliminal!! Pretty sure I’ll get it!
You won’t regret it 
1 Like
Have you made a review of Fenrir? Imma read it!
I might write a full review of all the modules included in my Wanted Khan custom.
Especially Ethereal Presence has been manifesting in interesting ways haha
4 Likes
Does Khan have the seamless seduction tactics integration in it like S&S?
Khan is definitly good for seduction, I would say a big factor of seduction in Khan is the confidence.
But I was able to read bodylanguage and all on Khan. So with enough time it’s good, it’s only the fact that Khan is a big program so you have to invest more time in it.
Edit : I’m so stoked for Fenrir 
Where the customs at 
How would my custom but with Sanguine, RICH, And mogul work out.
Are they light enough to justify having 3 cores?
Or would 2 still be better?
If i put all 3 into cores would it be better to cap out the modules at 10-15?
Or would you just recommend mogul + rich instead of mogul + rich + sanguine core… keeping sanguine as a module instead?
1 Like
This is good, though Khan ST4 is a hard title to run alone, so you’ll definitely get recon with the additional modules. Might be wise to run Khan separately in the stack, then use this particular custom as an enhancer for Khan (or any title that would benefit from this).
4 Likes
This is good, but see my last post about Khan ST4 in a custom. This is also very aggressive (Khan, Edge of Danger, Untouchable, Fearsome, etc.) so expect some recon and people acting strange around you, since it’ll take awhile for you to become congruent with this.
3 Likes
No problems here.
No problems here.
2 Likes
This is good, except Alchemist ST4 is very dense. Consider using the major title version to stack with this, which allows you to stop running the custom, or ST4 if you become overwhelmed.
3 Likes
So, as a soft rule, it’s better not to use St4 modules in ZP customs?
2 Likes
Is it because of the SS core? Would it also be better for @friday to remove his Wanted core?
What if someone want to run Khan with name embedded?
Oh, I got it.
Sub name : Emperor strikes back (ii)
1)Emperor
2)Stark
3)Hom
4)Virtu Mathematica
5)THe Way of ROI
6)Emperors Voice
7)Dragon tongue
8)Story Teller
9)Sacred Words
10)True Sell
11)Way of Understanding
12)Wisdom Personified
13)The lines
14 )The Streams
15)Organisation Perfected
16)Secrets of Akasha wealth
17)Omnideimnsional*
18)Unrelentless Wealth Motivation and
19)Joie de Vivre
20)Instant Buisness Tactician
This is really helpful. Thank you. I have two months to think about it; but I think I’ll just need to use another core for my hypnosis custom. There’s actually a major program for hypnosis in the ‘Planned’ section of the Roadmap. It may end up being perfect for this purpose.
Interesting. In fact, I ended up choosing not to create a ZP build of Naissance at this time. Yesterday was my first time to run the Qv2 version as part of a hybrid stack. That seems to be in line with your recommendations.
It seems that your responses on this thread may be implicitly helping to answer another question I’ve been considering:
“When and under what conditions, if ever, might it be advisable to run a Qv2 program rather than a ZP program?”
1 Like
I also would love to know the answer to this question. Thanks for posing this question for the community @Malkuth
3 Likes