All of the titles were universalized to the best of our ability, including OG WB. It was made before we brought them on, so the new version has to go through the same process as every other title. Which means, lots of debates. But I love debating with them, so no worries, lol. We really do end up with a much better, effective title each time. If you’ve tried the ZPU or ZPU-Preview titles, you’ve experienced the end result of this process. PEACE for example.
11 Likes
Not at the moment. After Monarch and True Sell, we’re going to work with Engineering on some tech stuff. New build system, etc. Some Q-Pro work.
9 Likes
Hoping later this year, early next year. We’re considering moving OG Emperor up the release schedule, and I want some of that resilience / dominance scripting to go into the combat titles.
15 Likes
That is correct. Chosen was always outward facing. Chosen From Within was early inward facing scripting. CFW will keep the name, but you can consider it as “Chosen Reforged.”
9 Likes
Yes! I’d love Spartan Apex to have a more dominant edge.
3 Likes
Thank you 
It’s such an awesome laboratory that just needs some quality of life improvements not to get overwhelming.
3 Likes
The following is subject to change a bit by the weekend.
Stage 1 is called EoG: True Sell. It’s a “survey” of the entire four stages. This is reminiscent of the older sequential four stage model, where the last stage covered the entire title. You won’t need to run them sequentially this time, however. You can run Stage 1 as a major title and it covers all the bases.
Stage 2 is the “pipeline” stage. It has the manifestation of leads, as well as the CRM scripting (understanding your customers, providing them with what they need, etc.).
Stage 3 is focused intensely on closing and negotiation skills. While this scripting is spread through the entire title, this stage goes heavy on this.
Stage 4 is a unique stage. It’ll be a surprise, but it’s geared toward those who have reached a level of success and focuses on empire building.
17 Likes
@Fire has made new versions of everything. We just need to test them. But, we’ve been so busy with scripting that we haven’t had time to test like we want. As soon as Monarch and True Sell is dropped, we’ll pivot to that a bit.
10 Likes
All is well. They didn’t like the idea of “harem” scripting, but I successfully debated that. I made the argument that they’re arguing optics, not ethics – the former of which I am not concerned with. “Ethical non-monogamy” is the societal container for the concept, and from my perspective, if a bunch of consenting adults want to date each other simultaneously, it’s not their right to cast judgment. That goes too far into moralizing, when I am interested in whether the title is effective and ethical in the sense that all parties enjoy themselves.
28 Likes
I assumed as much… you’re certainly inclusive & want beneficial results for all… I get a little concerned when new agents (eg. legal & ethics) outside of creatives get their hands involved… though I appreciate your dilemma of exponential growth and mitigating problems before they occur
9 Likes
Remember that Ethics and Legal works for us, not vice versa. Ultimately, we have full creative control. We use them as part of our creative process – The Crucible (I mentioned it before) – where we will come up with an idea, a basic script, and then beat the shit out of out to refine the idea into something universal and highly effective.
11 Likes
With that said, is Limitless the debate title or is there a module for that?
2 Likes
Words matter
We all know that
Hence why people get name embedded titles or customs
The script changing part got me… that’s all
I assumed until today those departments merely suggested copywriting alternatives
which I wholeheartedly understand
Limitless does have debate scripting – it helps you defend your ideas in an informative manner. ASBR has some as well.
6 Likes
The way I see it, that phrase itself already carries this moralizing notion that non-monogamy is somehow inherently less ethical than monogamy. As if people aren’t able (or supposed) to freely form relationships based on what they’re aligned with, but instead on what serves a certain narrative.
We have enough tyrannical BS going on in the world. Let consenting adults define their relationships however they mutually agree.
10 Likes
Exactly. That was my point to them. The term itself was just used to illustrate the concept within a structured conversation. As a company, we have no interest in passing judgment on how and who individuals choose to date.
13 Likes
The certain narrative that already exists says that non-monogamous love is immoral by default, so it makes sense to say “ethical” non-monogamy - especially given the beliefs around monogamy at the time the word was invented, which could have been the 90’s or smth,
Now there’s other words, polyamory being the common one
2 Likes
And it shows in your catalogue. I respect that a lot about you guys.
6 Likes
Been rereading ASBR, wanna customize it with INDEX GATE…
2 Likes