Thank you, and I appreciate that. I can ping you outside of this, but I am leaning towards trusting the new RICH will be way better for my use case
I think C&C is a better sub for its intended goal. It’s a better, more powerful sub.
It’s less compatible with my role or as a direct HOM replacement than I expected. So let me be clear, I am having trouble running it at this time for my role and purposes. I see in every way why it’s superior to its indended goal
I’m speaking, given my personal concerns for my situation, and as a user, the sub experientially is unrecognizable to HOM.
(Others are citing their experience on this as well. As stated, it’s not a bad thing, but it’s very different. I won’t tag them, but they can speak for themselves as well.)
This is about choosing what works for me, which is a vastly different direction from HOM as I am experiencing it, both subjectively and metrically (see below). My concerned was for titles showing up as vastly different in my experience in a way that disrupts something that has worked extremely well for me.
Not a critique on the direction chosen, but my attempt to be responsible for an evolution that may not include me.
While I care about subjective experience, my main focus is on results.
I’m talking metric results as well. Everything I do is measured in lead quantity, lead quality (metrically analyzed through my company) , calls held, calls cancelled, calls reached, revenue, revenue per client, it all shows up as personal income, and it’s compared against other sales representatives given the shared landscape.
For me personally, every metric I have has tanked since switching to C&C - and it’s gotten worse, and the entire team has gotten signficantly better. I’m working and grinding signficantly harder to meet weekly metrics, even though I’ve been outperforming everyone on all metrics for over a year. It’s progressively gone down every week. I moved into microloops starting week 2, and changed nothing else with my stack. As part of that decrease in everything. My experience on calls is signficantly more challenging, and signficant less access to my own ‘sales brilliance’. I can subjectively feel the qualitative difference in the approaches on sales as easily as I can tell the difference talking to a woman or socializing on Khan vs. Primal seduction, vs. Primal. It is like looking at colors or picking different objects, flavors. Its obvious.
So I guess, given that C&C is such a superior feature-wise, I’m not clear on why there’s a sudden drop metrically for me so much. Maybe recon, or maybe I am incompatible with the sub given ZP ‘revealing’ nature?
It’s very easy for me to see how subs affect concrete results, given my schedule and work.
I’d love to weild it more effectively, and I can keep C&C in rotation, but not sure how long to give it before making an assessment outside of what I am seeing
That’s an awesome result with the $700K, and I’m excited to see and hear more things like that. I’ll do a full report later on the Crown and Capital thread as there are many benefits I am seeing outside of work.
I’m not just referring to warmth. I’m referring to the sales capacity that HOM gave in my experience. There was much more than warmth, but the essence was a kind of trust and a mutual working through to arrive at a deal, a sale, or an outcome together, it shows up as a kind of verbal wizardy where I can spin antyhing into a win-win. Also, a high-volume lead manifestation quality that happens on HOM.
That’s definitely fair; the intended purpose and goals are there.
I specifically said the re-imaging has me concerned, as the updates and improvements may not work the same for me. Based on my experience with C&C. I am such a vocal fan of everything here, and I have strong results quickly with almost every sub. I really, really wanted and have been pulling for C&C to work for my situation and overall. And I’m just struggling with it for my main income driver and given the improvements not sure why.
