I’m not on that version now, though Khan ST2 (Terminus). It seems to deliver a more intense experience, and there’s a strange, though pleasant information processing sensation where a layer of my mind almost perceives someone speaking to it, though it’s still not audible. It’s taken the intensity and edginess up a notch, but it’s contained and controlled. Whereas Khan-GLM Terminus is smooth and executes streamlined and seamless. For example, on my Wanted Black ZPQ (not Terminus), the perception, and processing is different, with output being enhanced. The sensation is more “in-your-face” and with those specific cases, I can anticipate effects to hit later that evening and most potently the following day because that information load will “diffuse.”
Just watch a video on it then
If it something people teach then you peep what they are talking about and test them out
If it something that you observe then you are going to make your own pet theory and test them out
Then repeat
this is the third cycles that I am running L：R and I am experiencing the module that I quote repeatably…some of the scripts that previously I unconsciously suppressed now emerging…I really think this module could be really versatile for various use cases。could we have a Q module version ？@SaintSovereign @Fire
I noticed that RICH Trader and RAIKOV are recommended in a stack together. Is my intuition correct in that you could best utilize RAIKOV by watching playback chart data/back testing and effectively learn from the market, rather than from a specific teacher or model?
If not, what would be the optimal application for the RICH Trader + RAIKOV stack?
From my experience, you can learn from seemingly “inanimate” things. I say go for it. Might not be 100% as effective as from a human model though.
Yes, exactly. The market itself becomes the teacher. If you have a coach who gives good information, it will help there as well.
One thing I’m starting to do is go through my model’s works that I actually don’t think are the best. Ones with a few “flaws”. Being able to understand the mistakes someone makes, where their blindsides may be, actually makes understanding them as a person and creator even better. The image in your head gets more “real” as you start to identify them as another human being with flaws, whose method of work still has a few areas that could be tweaked. Since they’re not on a pedestal anymore, relating to them gets so much easier.
I’m also enjoying it because it gives me a direct way to insert my own style or approach into their work, making it more of a fusion than a rote replication. Plus being able to understand the idea underneath what they made. The emotional expression that existed before the person tried to translate it into being. Super hard to explain, but it’s like I can see or hear an idea, bare it down to its root, and then find multiple different ways to achieve its expression.
Curious to know from others running this in a stack. Does it seem to demand a lot of energy? Or does it sort of blend with the other titles? I recently decided to stick to one title only, but I feel like raikov could be a good enhancer vs dominating or competing for my energy.
I’ve been using this sub since end of December and I have not felt any decrease in energy. Actually, on the first listen it increased my energy. My visualization and imagination has improved with this title as well. I created my own Raikov meditation audio on my phone and visualize the Raikov switching head methods with the people I want to model.
Amazing! I was gonna stack this with seductress. I’m trying to get into fashion and I know the fastest way is to just emulate others and I feel like this would help a lot.
It definitely should. Good luck!
@SaintSovereign I am looking to get a PMP Certification among others, understand and apply the concepts, pass exams with ease and confidence. How can I use this title for that, and is there a title you’d recommend stacking it with?
Is this one considered ZPV2 or ZPV2-MAX?
This was 5.16.2023 during STKS season. I’d safely assume so, or it may be even more improved over a span of years. I hope.
I’m so ready to play this tomorrow. Three focuses:
-
Train like Special Operations Forces
-
Quantitative Analysis
-
Learning foreign language (May play Polyglot down the road)
On one end is combat training and on the other end is solving real-world problems with mathematics. I am curious if this thing can do modeling for multiple individuals, or if it’s more optimal with just one?
Yeah, my language is up on this. Not through intense conscious guidance, though there is a marked increase in the will to do more practice. It’s not an intense burst of motivation, but it is snowballing. I’m in this new era of gradual progress over intense burst, and the payoffs are bigger in the long-run.
My Polish is getting better.